|
Post by The Resister on Nov 2, 2022 16:41:28 GMT
Originally, our laws were based on the English Common Law. English Common Law relies on what is known as stare decisis. Stare decisis is a fancy Latin term meaning let the decision stand. So, when the courts rule on an issue, that IS the law all the way up to the level of United States Supreme Court. Once the United States Supreme Court rules on the law, then it is the final say. In about 1804 (IIRC) the United States Supreme Court ruled that they were the final arbiters of what the law is in a case known as Marbury v. Madison.
Okay, so I'm good with that part. It should stand to reason that once the United States Supreme Court rules on what the law means, if it is a constitutional issue, the only recourse after the ruling by the United States Supreme Court is to amend the Constitution. That makes sense, doesn't it? Let us say you want to do something so you read the law and the final word on the Constitution. You're good. Right? Well, not exactly. The situation we have today is that you can obey the law to the letter, including the rulings by the United States Supreme Court and still find yourself in legal trouble. The United States Supreme Court has decided that not only can they interpret the law, but also reinterpret their own holdings! That is also known as legislating from the bench.
In theory, we have the executive, legislative and judicial branches of government. The United States Supreme Court has NO AUTHORITY under the Constitution to be legislators. There is no way that the American people can obey the law when it is subject to change in the courts, especially when the highest Court is legislating. Throw in for good measure the fact that the United States Supreme Court gives plenary powers to other branches of the government. Now, let us add in the coup de grace here. The executive department uses regulatory agencies (some, like the IRS, aren't even a part of the government) to circumvent the Constitution. These regulatory agencies write their own laws, sometimes have their own courts and they aren't subject to any laws under the Constitution (the BATFE is one such agency.) Their laws can be constantly changing, capriciously and arbitrarily enforced and, in most cases, the courts give their interpretation and enforcement of regulatory law a rubber stamp of approval... the Constitution be damned.
Furthermore, when you cited the earliest immigration statute, those laws are based on the illegally ratified 14th Amendment. The 14th Amendment was passed under the pretext of granting citizenship to nonwhites. Not only was that amendment illegally ratified, its real purpose was to nullify our Bill of Rights (our unalienable Rights) and reduce all Americans to the status of a slave. Our unalienable Rights were abolished and the 14th Amendment created two classes of citizens. Until the passage of the National ID / REAL ID Act - E Verify, you could reclaim your Preamble status and preserve your unalienable Rights. But the right wing conservatives wanted to be equal slaves with the nonwhites. Sooo... they settled for a National ID Card based on the Socialist Surveillance Number ... there I go again "Social Security Number" and they are now tracked and put under surveillance from the womb to the tomb 24 / 7 / 365. My mission in life is to teach all people to identify and claim their Liberty via their unalienable Rights.
|
|
|
Post by The Resister on Nov 2, 2022 16:45:11 GMT
Back on point here: So, America was founded on Christian principles by men who sought to have a constitutional Republic that acknowledged unalienable Rights. While all men have unalienable Rights, only citizens had the benefits, privileges, and immunities afforded by the government that weren't related to unalienable Rights. People had a Right to Liberty, but non-citizens couldn't vote, hold public office, draw out of the public dole (welfare, entitlements (sic), etc.) Furthermore, non-whites could not become citizens. H.R. 40, a Bill to Establish an Uniform Rule of Naturalization and Enable Aliens to Hold Lands under Certain Conditions, was introduced in the Senate on March 4, 1790. The bill provided that “ any Alien being a free white person” who had resided within the United States for two years could file a petition for naturalization in any common law court located in a state in which they had resided for at least one year. After “m aking proof to the satisfaction of such Court that he is a person of good character, and taking the oath or affirmation prescribed by law to support the Constitution of the United States,” such person would become a citizen. It also provided citizenship for children of U.S. citizens who were born abroad. When you add that to the misrepresented slavery issue, Americans are divided as well as misinformed. Be that as it may, non-whites could not be citizens; they could not vote; they could not hold public office; they could not intermarry with the Posterity of the Constitution. Of course, when you get down to technicalities, even white people that didn't own property (i.e. real estate couldn't vote.) Be that as it may, non-whites had unalienable Rights and they came here from every corner of the world to take advantage of opportunities willingly offered. The facts are that America never legalized slavery. It was a states rights issue and more than half the states outlawed slavery before the Constitution was ratified. That made the United States the first place to outlaw slavery in that era (where slavery was worldwide.) Going a step further while most of the rest of the world was engaged in the slave trade, those slaves in the United States ate better, go paid more, had better health care, better housing, and much better working conditions than their white skin blue collar counterparts that ended up as indentured servants. Indentured servants were treated so bad that over half of them never lived long enough to work their way out of servitude. The coup de grace here is that in the Constitution, the practice of importing slaves was ended in 1808 (not counting the fact that over half the states had already outlawed the practice.) My problem with liberalism that seeks to censor the truth and instill a false sense of guilt into the white race over this issue is a form of outright treason. We never question the fact that most of the inhabitants of the rest of the world: China, Japan, Korea, and Zimbabwe (just to name a few countries) are more than 98 percent homogeneous. In America we've come to destroy the homogeneity of the Posterity under the pretext of equality, but I digress. The race situation is what it is. We'll definitely come back to this aspect of the discussion later on. To summarize the thread thus far: America was founded by white Christians believing that they were the Israelites of the Bible, building a city on a hill, a beacon to the rest of the world to see an example of what a constitutional Republic predicated upon Christian values would look like. It's hard to marginalize the blueprint. In under three hundred years America went from struggling pioneers to become the greatest nation in the annals of history. The advances in medicine, science, travel, and a strong military were the product of our nation's values and that blueprint we chose to follow. Everything from the airplane to the transistor (that ushered in the computer age) are American inventions. The discovery of electricity was an American discovery. We led (and still lead the world) in missionaries sent out to help people all over the world. America lived up to its destiny to be the New Jerusalem. Our system of jurisprudence followed the Bible's system of jurisprudence. That is our history and that is our legacy to the world. It was all about to change... Back on point here: "So, America was founded on Christian principles by men who sought to have a constitutional Republic that acknowledged unalienable Rights. While all men have unalienable Rights, only citizens had the benefits, privileges, and immunities afforded by the government that weren't related to unalienable Rights. People had a Right to Liberty, but non-citizens couldn't vote, hold public office, draw out of the public dole (welfare, entitlements (sic), etc.) Furthermore, non-whites could not become citizens." •Just wanted to add; reading the above quoted paragraph reminded me of something related to this i'd read a while back pertaining to the agents of the A.B.A. and an oath they supposedly take which pledges loyalty to the B.A.R. If True [¿?], wouldn't that automatically disqualify them as US citizens—and so from public office, voting etcetera? Probably got the PDF of the article saved, though right now am simply going off memory. It went on to detail how Lawyers are foreign agents & the tools used to usurp USA, and other nations respective national legal bodies + governments. Have attached an article on the subject, below, though not the PDF one mentioned. www.city-journal.org/lawyers-for-radical-changeSent from my CPH2025 using Tapatalk Your reply is in my next post. I don't know if the board screwed up or the way you quoted stuff, but nobody can quote you in a reply. So I'm replying and notifying you with this.
|
|
|
Post by curiousfiend on Nov 2, 2022 18:59:01 GMT
Your reply is in my next post. I don't know if the board screwed up or the way you quoted stuff, but nobody can quote you in a reply. So I'm replying and notifying you with this. Yeah sorry, i don't know how my reply ended up being included within your quoted post. Definitely wasn't intentional. Will try editing it in a minute. Just been going through mountains of files saved on this device, to find the PDF i'd mentioned. It turns out it was a PDF and an article on another website, which i've managed to find both; •First, is the website article regarding the- 'B.A.R.'; www.thelibertybeacon.com/british-accreditation-registry-crown-temple-b-a-r/•Second, an original version[*in PDF format] of something i think is quite a special document; drive.google.com/file/d/1pBrZ5sYmtmZpiUjVUnrAn-CRYHTvOYgS/view?usp=drivesdkSent from my CPH2025 using Tapatalk
|
|
|
Post by curiousfiend on Nov 2, 2022 19:19:50 GMT
Originally, our laws were based on the English Common Law. English Common Law relies on what is known as stare decisis. Stare decisis is a fancy Latin term meaning let the decision stand. So, when the courts rule on an issue, that IS the law all the way up to the level of United States Supreme Court. Once the United States Supreme Court rules on the law, then it is the final say. In about 1804 (IIRC) the United States Supreme Court ruled that they were the final arbiters of what the law is in a case known as Marbury v. Madison. Okay, so I'm good with that part. It should stand to reason that once the United States Supreme Court rules on what the law means, if it is a constitutional issue, the only recourse after the ruling by the United States Supreme Court is to amend the Constitution. That makes sense, doesn't it? Let us say you want to do something so you read the law and the final word on the Constitution. You're good. Right? Well, not exactly. The situation we have today is that you can obey the law to the letter, including the rulings by the United States Supreme Court and still find yourself in legal trouble. The United States Supreme Court has decided that not only can they interpret the law, but also reinterpret their own holdings! That is also known as legislating from the bench. In theory, we have the executive, legislative and judicial branches of government. The United States Supreme Court has NO AUTHORITY under the Constitution to be legislators. There is no way that the American people can obey the law when it is subject to change in the courts, especially when the highest Court is legislating. Throw in for good measure the fact that the United States Supreme Court gives plenary powers to other branches of the government. Now, let us add in the coup de grace here. The executive department uses regulatory agencies (some, like the IRS, aren't even a part of the government) to circumvent the Constitution. These regulatory agencies write their own laws, sometimes have their own courts and they aren't subject to any laws under the Constitution (the BATFE is one such agency.) Their laws can be constantly changing, capriciously and arbitrarily enforced and, in most cases, the courts give their interpretation and enforcement of regulatory law a rubber stamp of approval... the Constitution be damned. Furthermore, when you cited the earliest immigration statute, those laws are based on the illegally ratified 14th Amendment. The 14th Amendment was passed under the pretext of granting citizenship to nonwhites. Not only was that amendment illegally ratified, its real purpose was to nullify our Bill of Rights (our unalienable Rights) and reduce all Americans to the status of a slave. Our unalienable Rights were abolished and the 14th Amendment created two classes of citizens. Until the passage of the National ID / REAL ID Act - E Verify, you could reclaim your Preamble status and preserve your unalienable Rights. But the right wing conservatives wanted to be equal slaves with the nonwhites. Sooo... they settled for a National ID Card based on the Socialist Surveillance Number ... there I go again " Social Security Number" and they are now tracked and put under surveillance from the womb to the tomb 24 / 7 / 365. My mission in life is to teach all people to identify and claim their Liberty via their unalienable Rights. *PSA; i am not sure why my last two posts have been included within the quoted posts i was responding to and i don't seem to have the option of editing the error. Hopefully this post doesn't have the same issue occur, and i'll now take a screenshot to attach below, to show that i'm not actually doing the error intentionally. Anywho, i reckon you're correct regarding the "14th amendment". Coz from what i've read it appears to be the case too. That is to say the "14th" is essentially an illegal addition. In my previous post, the PDF shows the original 13 Amendments and from my interpretation details (*among many other crucial points) that A.B.A. Lawyers are foreign Agents who've forfeited their right to hold public office in the United States of America. *Note; i am no academic scholar or nothin,...i am simply a man independently learning this stuff as i go. i present this information with the intention only for the purpose of sharing with far greater minds[*such as yours(*Resister)] than mine own and in the hope that this information will be of/or put to, good use. Cheers Sent from my CPH2025 using Tapatalk
|
|
professorx
Global Moderator
Site Administrator
Posts: 413
|
Post by professorx on Jan 29, 2023 0:25:15 GMT
Having gone to a gun show today it reminded me of how important this subject is. Ignorant people were swarming to buy those AR pistols that will soon be classified as short barreled rifles. When that happens their AR will be the same as a machine gun. Pistols will become NFA items subject to the same laws machine guns are. What that means is that they will be registered. But you won't have to pay for it. Keep believing that. If you own a pistol you can cross state lines and carry within that state's carry laws. You can't do that with an NFA weapon. You have to tell the government every time you leave the house with it. You have to get permission to take it anywhere. Your spouse, children, and your friends can't shoot your NFA weapon. Even if the government backs down on who can shoot your weapon they will not change the fact that your weapon is only safe in the county you live in. You can't loan it out or buy one for general family use. There are probably fifty reasons you wouldn't want to comply with the law. It is just that it had so much bearing on this topic it had to be mentioned.
The public reaction to this issue proves to me that most people don't know where their rights came from. State governments keep violating the Constitution. Lower courts keep ignoring the precedents of the higher courts. Nobody reacts. Regulatory agencies keep passing new laws when that isn't even what they are legally empowered to do. We no longer have a Constitution. The quicker we learn that and when we accept the fact that the government no longer guarantees rights the quicker we will be to doing proactive things to save ourselves.
|
|
|
Post by The Resister on Feb 3, 2023 21:30:27 GMT
And so we come back to this thread again. I'd like to take a few paragraphs and sum up the entire thread along with any points I may have missed. America was founded as a constitutional Republic based on Christian principles for the benefit of the white Christians who had fled the tyranny of King George (primarily) and other forms of tyranny in other white countries. Even as the privilege of citizenship was afforded only to white freemen, the unalienable Rights contemplated in the Declaration of Independence applied to all who came here. And people came from every corner of the earth to take advantage of the opportunities willingly offered. Our problem, as a nation, officially began before we even opted to separate from King George in 1776. In May of that year, the Illuminati was founded and they began implementing their agenda concurrently as we were founding a constitutional Republic. And so, today, the critics of our form of government will tell you that Masons (people duped by the Illuminati) were responsible for the founding of our nation. They offer NO proof as to how far along the Illuminati was in their brainwashing of the Masons they had influence over. Furthermore, of the 56 men who signed the Declaration of Independence, only 9 were Masons: short-fact.com/how-many-people-on-the-declaration-of-independence-were-freemasons/#:~:text=Of%20the%2056%20men%20that%20signed%20the%20Declaration,fraternity%20influenced%20directly%20the%20creation%20of%20the%20document. To make it even more interesting, Thomas Jefferson, primary author of the Declaration of Independence, was not a Mason. Those making the claims about a few Masons influencing the founding of this country give the 47 other founders ZERO credit for their contributions AND presume all of them were too stupid to know when the anti-Christ was working to corrupt the process before it began. To add insult to injury, those people have NO faith in God. They do not presume that God can use evil people to achieve a just result (though the Bible has many examples.) And, as a side note, many people join and support evil organizations thinking they can change them from within. I recall a few short decades ago that Neal Knox wanted me to stay in the National Rifle Association. He knew, for a fact, it was corrupt and doing more to hurt gun owners than the left was. But, he stayed and even ran for the top spot. He was NOT a sell out, but rather an idealist. How do we know this wasn't the case with people like George Washington and Benjamin Franklin? What evidence is there that their Masonic religion trumped their Christian faith? The primary author of the Constitution and father of the Bill of Rights was James Madison. He was NOT a Mason. When do we acknowledge the Christians that contributed to the founding of this country? Let's move forward. Nobody can really agree on when America started to falter. The really pessimistic people who give NO credit to Christ, Christians, the founders and the original Posterity of the Constitution start at 1776. To them America was founded by Masons and we should be beholden to them for what we have or willing to destroy this country in toto. Let's see some other notable dates: 1868 the 14th Amendment was illegally ratified - it was supposedly passed to grant citizenship to blacks. It's real purpose was to rescind the Bill of Rights and make them government granted privileges for all President Woodrow Wilson signed the Federal Reserve Act in 1913. This transferred the duties of Congress to a private banking concern to set our country's economic policies In 1913 the 16th Amendment was ratified In 1933 President Roosevelt declared the nation bankrupt by Executive Orders 6073, 6102, 6111 and Executive Order 6260 (we were financially insolvent) The United States Supreme Court concocted the mythical " separation of church and state" in 1947 in the case of Everson v. Board with NO prior precedents or case law to substantiate it. The ONLY document they had was a PRIVATE letter written to the Danbury Baptists by Thomas Jefferson - AND it meant 180 degrees OPPOSITE of what the atheists, liberals, etc. argue today! In 1965 they passed the Kennedy Immigration Law aka Hart - Cellar Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965. That bill eliminated the quotas that kept immigration in check AND secured our cultural identity In 1967 the United States Supreme Court struck down laws that prohibited inter-racial marriage I will have to do another entry before turning the thread over to the posters for any comment...
|
|
|
Post by The Resister on Feb 6, 2023 4:18:48 GMT
I keep trying to figure out how to be somewhat all inclusive about the problems we face and where we are at this stage in history, but there is no complete over-view. America is ruined morally; destroyed financially; burned out politically; screwed socially; blind to the religious contributions of Christians to our unique culture. Nobody can put a definite date on when we began to falter. Also there is a maxim that to the victor goes the spoils. Therefore, atheists, liberals, agnostics, socialists, communists, etc. have been calling the shots for quite a few years now. They have gone after our flags, statues, monuments, memorials, plaques and paintings of the historical figures of our past. They are erasing our history and they are substituting a false and dishonest narrative about America. I'd like to share something with you however: When my ancestors left the tyranny and oppression of King George, they founded a constitutional Republic based on Christian principles. In less than 300 years they developed a civilization, unmatched in the annals of history. The Roman Empire lasted for 1,000 years (1,500 depending upon which historian is defining it.) In less than 300 years the American people had far surpassed the Roman Empire in military power. Our army and navy dwarfed anything any other civilization had ever attempted. We had more inventions than any other civilization had - and in record time. We made air travel, automobiles, and cross country train travel possible. Benjamin Franklin discovered electricity and William Shockley invented the transistor (which ushered in the computer era.) The first open heart surgery was done in the United States. When it comes to sending missionaries out, the United States has led the world since the first foreign missionaries were dispatched to a foreign country. We became a great country so long as we followed a certain blueprint. We were blessed proportionally to the degree we followed the blueprint laid out by the founders and framers of this country. And, as we rejected that blueprint, the more we were cursed until we woke up on morning to find we had lost our country. I've posted the cycles of history here before, but will give you a link just in case: commonsensegovernment.com/the-tytler-cycle-revisited/Unless I missed my que, we are in the bondage cycle and have been for at least 50 years and as much as 155 years (when the 14th Amendment was illegally ratified.) It will only be when you understand WHAT is wrong and WHY it is wrong will you rise up to do something to start a new cycle. This board serves as a think tank to get you into the conversation, finding answers, asking the right questions and helping others who have been deprived by the censorship of the mainstream. America has a destiny. Our forefathers believed it and they built a nation predicated upon certain presuppositions. The fact that America was so prosperous, innovative, productive and vibrant under that blueprint is evidence in my mind that Freedom and Liberty work. That is the basis for my future posting here. Your views are welcome.
|
|