|
Post by The Resister on Sept 15, 2023 17:35:35 GMT
I belong to one other board other than Resisters. It purports to be a board about things relating to specific neighborhoods. Mostly people want to talk about their fur babies or maybe brag about their children graduating from school. There are a lot of karens that want to bitch about someone else's lawn or that they had the audacity to fix their car in the driveway and are looking for bias confirmation so they don't feel guilty about calling code enforcement. The karens complain because some guy rang their door bell AND had the gall to knock too!!! (SMH) Businesses get online and you see some sockpuppets recommending some over-priced renovators and they get mad as Hell when I post. Asking a big box plumber to put in a valve to flush your toilet is like expecting a top notch chef to make you a hamburger at Mickey Ds. But, they get their tighty whiteys in a bunch because I try to get retired people who once had the skills to do odd jobs and I encourage younger guys that are building their own businesses to do the small odd jobs and cater to those who are on the lower spectrum of earnings. Gee how the big box and so - called "contractors" complain!
That kind of atmosphere limits what I can say there, but they cannot stop me from saying what I have to say here and inviting people to read the response. There is the element on that board (and other boards as well) that like to talk politics and challenge people on boards where an honest reply can't be posted. But, we can definitely say it here on this board. Consequently, I have some things to say about relationships in your neighborhood.
The first people that I'd like to address in this thread are the pabulum puking lying liberals that pretend they want to discuss politics, but only in a forum where they won't be challenged and all sides presented. A poster on that other board implied that coming here was supporting MAGA and discussing politics with me would land one in prison. Pardon me, but what a lying sack of horse manure. That coward didn't have the integrity or the courage to READ a few threads here at Resisters to find out what we're about. I'm more opposed to the MAGA crowd than the left is. I understand that Trump's vision of MAGA absolutely guarantees that, in the final analysis, the left wins. I'm not on the left as it represents progressives, socialists, liberals, communists and Democrats. I oppose the MAGA deal as it represents fascism and National Socialism (and sometimes without the racial element.) That is me personally. If you are on either side, you have an open forum to state your case and here we are on a level playing field. THAT is why neither side wants to post here. Americans have become moral cowards, unable and unwilling to openly debate their views. The few who do come here and post know that while we don't all agree, they will have the opportunity to say what they really mean.
To those who get on boards and bitch about the drugs and violence in the schools and neighborhoods, I say that it does no good to complain unless you want to DO something productive in your neighborhood. Talk is cheap. You cannot expect the government to do for you what you are unwilling to do for yourself. My advice is that you hold yourselves accountable and DO something about your own shortcomings. Values begin in the home and follow you out the door into the neighborhood and the world. To those who are victims of car break ins, home burglaries, trespassers, etc. you should come here and learn how a neighborhood watch can be set up and how a civilian militia could help bring about a safer and more law abiding atmosphere to where you live. You can continue to hide on chickensqueeze sites that delete posts like this one OR you can get engaged in serious discussions from time to time. You can trash talk me on other boards, but I can respond to you here. And while most will be too cowardly to register and post here, the majority of those who trash talk and those who get off on it will read my replies here... and they cannot unsee what they see here. Neither can they stop others from reading my replies. It is the ultimate reply to censorship.
|
|
professorx
Global Moderator
Site Administrator
Posts: 413
|
Post by professorx on Sept 17, 2023 3:36:22 GMT
A word to all the NIMBY people - not in my back yard. MYOB - mind your own business.
|
|
|
Post by The Resister on Sept 19, 2023 22:48:15 GMT
Have you ever encountered the kind of "neighbor" that wants to argue in the wrong forum? I know one and he is so much of a moral coward that he only calls himself "Bill."
Bill is a misinformed Democrat that would argue with a tree stump and so we have this board, a level playing field and his chance to tell you about the great democracy he lives in and how using Code Enforcement against his neighbors isn't weaponizing the government in order to serve your own agenda.
Now, we all know that "Bill" lacks the cahones to have a real debate in a forum designed for that purpose, so I'll be brief. America is a constitutional Republic and the intent of the founders and framers was to have the least amount of government possible. "Bill" believes otherwise and IF has the balls (I realize he doesn't have the brain), I'd like to open the door to real discussion. But, really, how much intervention do you want the government to have over your personal property (specifically your home)?
|
|
professorx
Global Moderator
Site Administrator
Posts: 413
|
Post by professorx on Sept 20, 2023 2:30:12 GMT
Having checked out that exchange with Bill all that can be said is wow! Wow! A conversation about code enforcement devolves into Dred Scott, the notion that America is a democracy, HOAs, property rights. All one can say is WTH? This is my own view.
Code Enforcement is all about enforcing someone else values on a neighborhood. Bill could never answer the really tough questions. People move to an area and build towns. It was rural and had farms then the city people moved in and displaced the rural population. The questions that raised is why did people build modern homes next to pastures and chicken houses if that kind of atmosphere devalued homes? Bill did not answer that. Once the more suburban types moved in they proceeded to change the laws. If they did not like it there why did they come? And if it were not to their liking should they not have been the ones to move? Again no answer from Bill. What gave those people the right to move in and dictate to the existing population how they should live? Still no answer from Bill. Today those people who do not agree with the way things are have had enough and are doing what needs to be done to change it. Bill thinks they should just move. He could not tell you why the suburbanites should not move if they did not like the way things were.
As for HOAs, the point was made that the color of your house should not impact its value. Bill kept saying it is the law and the courts have said the HOAs can legally do so. That begs an important question here. If the guy next door can decide the color of your house then what stops an HOA from deciding what color of people can live in the house? Currently people hide behind civil rights legislation but if a court decides that people can discriminate then an HOA can tell people who can and cannot live in a house. The government big enough to give you everything you want is big enough to take everything you have.
Bill tried to be Perry Mason. He seems not to understand that America is not a democracy. Democracy cannot be found in the Declaration of Independence, Articles of Confederation, Constitution of the United States. The founders and framers had nothing good to say about a democracy. If Bill wants to debate that he has found the right place. That brings me to a personal note.
Resisters comes down on republicans, democrats, left, right, conservative, liberal, libertarian, independent, and every other point of view equally harsh. By calling an interactive discussion board a right wing blog that individual made a personal attack on me. Do not sweat that bloated turd. He does not have a single fact to back him and the last place he would come to is one where he can sling all that skeet and then have it challenged in a place where it will be until this server no longer exists. My bet is that after that other thread is deleted by the censors on that other board he will disappear. The reply to his attack on me is that he will prove to be a gutless rube of the AOC variety.
|
|
|
Post by The Resister on Sept 20, 2023 15:18:57 GMT
Having checked out that exchange with Bill all that can be said is wow! Wow! A conversation about code enforcement devolves into Dred Scott, the notion that America is a democracy, HOAs, property rights. All one can say is WTH? This is my own view. Code Enforcement is all about enforcing someone else values on a neighborhood. Bill could never answer the really tough questions. People move to an area and build towns. It was rural and had farms then the city people moved in and displaced the rural population. The questions that raised is why did people build modern homes next to pastures and chicken houses if that kind of atmosphere devalued homes? Bill did not answer that. Once the more suburban types moved in they proceeded to change the laws. If they did not like it there why did they come? And if it were not to their liking should they not have been the ones to move? Again no answer from Bill. What gave those people the right to move in and dictate to the existing population how they should live? Still no answer from Bill. Today those people who do not agree with the way things are have had enough and are doing what needs to be done to change it. Bill thinks they should just move. He could not tell you why the suburbanites should not move if they did not like the way things were. As for HOAs, the point was made that the color of your house should not impact its value. Bill kept saying it is the law and the courts have said the HOAs can legally do so. That begs an important question here. If the guy next door can decide the color of your house then what stops an HOA from deciding what color of people can live in the house? Currently people hide behind civil rights legislation but if a court decides that people can discriminate then an HOA can tell people who can and cannot live in a house. The government big enough to give you everything you want is big enough to take everything you have. Bill tried to be Perry Mason. He seems not to understand that America is not a democracy. Democracy cannot be found in the Declaration of Independence, Articles of Confederation, Constitution of the United States. The founders and framers had nothing good to say about a democracy. If Bill wants to debate that he has found the right place. That brings me to a personal note. Resisters comes down on republicans, democrats, left, right, conservative, liberal, libertarian, independent, and every other point of view equally harsh. By calling an interactive discussion board a right wing blog that individual made a personal attack on me. Do not sweat that bloated turd. He does not have a single fact to back him and the last place he would come to is one where he can sling all that skeet and then have it challenged in a place where it will be until this server no longer exists. My bet is that after that other thread is deleted by the censors on that other board he will disappear. The reply to his attack on me is that he will prove to be a gutless rube of the AOC variety. It appears that " Bill" wants to hide on that neighborhood board, realizing that they will soon delete his posts. According to the counter this thread has had over 70 views so the people over there know what that guy is: poseur and liberal coward. For those who don't know what is going on, let's summarize it: On another board a woman was angry because her neighbors used Code Enforcement against her rather than to come to her and say anything. Where I live they use Code Enforcement officers to write tickets for things like grass being over 8 inches high or maybe some junk is in your yard. Then there are people with Home Owners Associations (HOA) that concoct all manner of rules that limit a person's Rights to the quiet enjoyment of their own property. Maybe a person likes to rebuild old cars - Not in my back yard if you live in an HOA. How about if you want a house painted green, but they only allow white and yellow houses. You're SOL in an HOA. How can any organization limit your private property Rights? The courts have told these wannabe dictators they can do such; however, I pointed out that the only constant with laws is that they change. Let's look at the realm of possibility: Suppose that Trump gets elected again. Let's suppose that he appoints judges that believe that these civil rights laws have gone too far and they are now unconstitutional since they are being employed to further reverse discrimination. This is all within the realm of possibility. If that is the case, an HOA can then tell people who can and cannot live in their neighborhood. The liberals may dismiss that, but they should think it over. As for me I'm still whizzed about something. I bought a Ford Bronco and rebuilt the engine in it. I had about $3000 invested in the project. The Bronco was under my carport and somebody bitched about it. At the time, I was having to go into the hospital for major surgery and didn't have time to fight the fight. The county says that you have to put a tag on your car and the state says that you don't have to put a tag on your car, just pay the ad valorem tax. I paid the tax when I bought the Bronco. Now, I could have won the case, but I was flat on my ass the day I got served. I wasn't able to fight the case and do surgery and the surgery couldn't wait. My prognosis was listed as " poor" to begin with. So, I sold the Bronco for the value of scrap metal (you only get two weeks to comply.) Well, I could have gotten insurance on the Bronco and bought a tag, but I had to come up with a LOT of money for deductibles and co pays. I lost $2500 because some bitch in our neighborhood was offended by a Bronco that was UNDER MY CARPORT! A lot of people in my neighborhood are tiring of these petty ordinances and are fighting back. Fact is, in the subdivision I live in, when I got served so did 17 other residents (grass too high, stuff under the carport, too many cars in the driveway, etc.) There are only 22 houses on this road. "Bill" is a dumb ass that claims to believe in " democracy," yet has a problem with citizens complaining among each other as he realizes that acknowledging a problem exists is the first step in changing the status quo. So, he plays Perry Mason as you said. It's about " it's the law" and you gotta obey the law to HOAs (I don't live in one as the OP in the original thread does); it's about democracy, racism, the power of taxation, etc., etc. It's about everything except the facts. While " Bill" has no intention to defend his position, we can talk about the inherent weaknesses of his case (his refusal to debate it being the most obvious.) His neighbors will get to see my responses to his walls of text and he, like Trump, can get to see what it feels like to take a beat down that won't get deleted once the facts are on the table.
|
|
|
Post by The Resister on Sept 20, 2023 18:58:53 GMT
So, while I was out, " Bill" changed his profile on the other board. He is Bill Hinegardner. I can only post his name because he made it public. He is incessantly making false accusations and outright lying to posters. I can't say that because they want you to play nice. That's code for let the liberals knock the Hell out of you and don't respond in the same spirit. This is a level playing field here. Just for chits and giggles, I did want to show you what kind of a person this guy is and show him what full disclosure looks like. Bill wrote: " Some misinformed individual posted that AMC Entertainment was bought by China, which is hogwash, it’s an American headquartered in Kansas." RESPONSE: Bill is wrong AND I can anticipate his next objection to the truth so, let's lay the groundwork for it. If you ask a liberal they will tell you that there is systemic racism in America. It's such an overused term that it doesn't mean anything, but it sounds good to say it. About half of the people in the U.S. are Democrats (give or take a few percentage points.) Then there is a big portion of Republicans that are NOT for Trump... and he is actually a multiculturalist as has been proven in the thread on this board about him. Anyway... the overwhelming majority of Americans are walking lockstep with the one world / one race / one world religion as espoused by globalists, one worlders, humanists, Democrats, etc. Yet if there are 3 percent of the people that have any feelings toward race, the left argues that America is a racist country. Let that math sink in. According to the liberal and mainstream publication Newsweek: " The Dalian Wanda Group owns a minority of AMC shares since 2018 and owns Legendary Entertainment. Wang Jianlin, who is a member of the Chinese Communist Party, owns Dalian Wanda.
Although Wang is a party member, his company is not owned by China or the Communist Party, so AMC or Legendary Films are not owned by the CCP." www.newsweek.com/fact-check-does-chinese-communist-party-own-amc-entertainment-legendary-films-1565254What kind of " logic" is that? In the thread about China, it was reported that CHINA owns... and China is a communist country. While the United States may recognize the Rights of individuals, China does not. So, China tells its citizens what the parameters are for " owning" property outside of China. And the Chinese government would not allow Chinese to own any part of a business that was antithetical to the best interests of China. Bill is hoping you don't catch on, but even the liberal Newsweek did NOT rule the allegation to be false. Their claim is that it is " Mostly False" and that means they are admitting there is some truth in that. But, you think about it; analyze it beyond the semantics. China has a lot of influence and control in those corporations. The American government has none. The real point of the China thread is not to debate what the Communist Party owns, but how much of America is owned by foreign interests AND how little control we have over the movies we see, the products we use, etc.
|
|
professorx
Global Moderator
Site Administrator
Posts: 413
|
Post by professorx on Sept 21, 2023 1:59:42 GMT
It has dawned on me after reading that troll's postings. He is a fed. When we were on the Libertarian Forum there was that fed that started shit like that wanker does. Being a fed he was never kicked off of boards even when he drew people in and baited them breaking the board rules as he went. The people he attacked were the ones who got banned. Something tells me this is the same kind of fed and if he gets to stay on that board after what he has done there it will be confirmation in my mind. He still wants to call this board a right wing site and so on which tells me the liar is looking to start something he really couldn't handle on his own.
|
|
|
Post by The Resister on Sept 21, 2023 14:53:59 GMT
It has dawned on me after reading that troll's postings. He is a fed. When we were on the Libertarian Forum there was that fed that started shit like that wanker does. Being a fed he was never kicked off of boards even when he drew people in and baited them breaking the board rules as he went. The people he attacked were the ones who got banned. Something tells me this is the same kind of fed and if he gets to stay on that board after what he has done there it will be confirmation in my mind. He still wants to call this board a right wing site and so on which tells me the liar is looking to start something he really couldn't handle on his own. Yep. Fed. His cover is cyber security for the CDC, but he is a professional rabble rouser. He thinks that fact checking one item out of hundreds of posts here proves this is some kind of conspiracy theory / right wing site. He's a dumb son of a bitch, however. Anybody with an IQ above their shoe size can see that Donald Trump didn't get a free ride here. And how many times have I complained about the Constitution Free Zone? Oh, and let's not forget I was kicked to the curb over their National Socialist solutions with regard to immigration - and ironically, the right is still losing their butts on that one. The problem gets worse and they still don't know how to solve it. This guy denies that China is taking America over just because one guy bought out AMC theaters - though I'm skeptical of the deal. That too is not based on conspiracy theory. I recall when Lucent Technologies couldn't sell out to a company (whose name escapes me) because it was a foreign company and the government didn't want a foreign interest to control a system our government is dependent on. BTW, with the fall of Lucent, China (i.e. Huawei) was able to capitalize and virtually take over the lion's share of the 5 G providers. Anyway, Lucent was " broken up" and corporations were created in the U.S. to facilitate the sale of Lucent to OFS. I mention that deal as I'd bet that is what went on with AMC. But, what the Hell. We can let Bill have this one fantasy that he has proven something by capitalizing on one recent transfer of ownership. Bill contends that we are a democracy and he tried to claim that my references to an Army training manual noting the differences was wrong because the citing source isn't the actual manual. Let me rectify that here: archive.org/details/pdfy-X8kxTtso2nVVynxP/page/n89/mode/2upThe one thing that Army manual does is to note that representative government is NOT a feature exclusive to democracy NOR is democracy built solely on representative government. Democracy only respects the view of the masses; under our constitutional Republic the unalienable Rights of all people is deemed to be above the reach of government and, consequently, above the will of the masses.
|
|
|
Post by The Resister on Sept 23, 2023 22:19:30 GMT
YOU ARE NOT ALLOWED TO CRITICIZE THOSE LIBERALS THAT ARE IN CHARGE. STALKERS WILL BE PROTECTED PROVIDED THEY BELONG TO THOSE WHO WANT A GOD GOVERNMENT.
|
|
|
Post by The Resister on Sept 26, 2023 2:02:38 GMT
As predicted that other site banned me for answering Bill in the same spirit he addressed me in. He could say what he wanted and there wasn't a problem. His editing of posts accusing me of promoting sedition should have gotten his ass banned, but when you have feds on a board you can expect that they will employ cyber terrorism to stop you. I'd like to run across Bill. Cyber bullies need to dealt with and it bothers me to no end that dumb ass people prefer to give their business to boards like that while censor free sites are ignored. The masses want a government to babysit them.
|
|
professorx
Global Moderator
Site Administrator
Posts: 413
|
Post by professorx on Oct 5, 2023 0:39:51 GMT
I got to see the numerous times that shitsack posted about you and once you said that was not including pm and texts it is obvious he has a serious problem. There is another observation. The last time you had a shadow on the net it caused you to be banned for responding. All the rules are the same. People are not supposed to do certain things but if you agree with the people in power on the boards you are immune from the rules. The problem is you have a penchant for challenging the status quo. In this modern age most are not inclined to act in a mature manner. Every disagreement and every slight no matter how small is grounds for a social media war. It is a waste of time and it only gives you stress. It is too bad others do not come here and post where all sides have an equal say.
|
|
|
Post by noclevername on Oct 19, 2023 4:30:28 GMT
I got to see the numerous times that shitsack posted about you and once you said that was not including pm and texts it is obvious he has a serious problem. There is another observation. The last time you had a shadow on the net it caused you to be banned for responding. All the rules are the same. People are not supposed to do certain things but if you agree with the people in power on the boards you are immune from the rules. The problem is you have a penchant for challenging the status quo. In this modern age most are not inclined to act in a mature manner. Every disagreement and every slight no matter how small is grounds for a social media war. It is a waste of time and it only gives you stress. It is too bad others do not come here and post where all sides have an equal say. That explains a lot since I have been off this board. It will all blow over.
|
|
|
Post by The Resister on Oct 19, 2023 12:50:49 GMT
I got to see the numerous times that shitsack posted about you and once you said that was not including pm and texts it is obvious he has a serious problem. There is another observation. The last time you had a shadow on the net it caused you to be banned for responding. All the rules are the same. People are not supposed to do certain things but if you agree with the people in power on the boards you are immune from the rules. The problem is you have a penchant for challenging the status quo. In this modern age most are not inclined to act in a mature manner. Every disagreement and every slight no matter how small is grounds for a social media war. It is a waste of time and it only gives you stress. It is too bad others do not come here and post where all sides have an equal say. That explains a lot since I have been off this board. It will all blow over. Actually that doesn't explain it. Since making the initial post, we had weaponoffreedom invite me to another board. I figure I'd be the mature adult since he quit posting here - we don't really want an honest discussion in America. Well, lo and behold since these boards are full of trolls and government disinformation agents not to mention outright communists, who should I run up against other than the left wing board troll that lives on the Internet. Generally I try to hit the boards early in the day and then maybe in the evenings when I check my e mail. Unlike the rest of America I don't live on the Internet. I don't use it (or the other features) on my cell phone either. Anyway... Some twinkle toed communist cocksucker started claiming that he was a " practicing attorney" and accused me of selling conspiracy theories. Even weaponoffreedom bought into the guy's B.S. where I would quote the laws on owning firearms wherein the courts stated that the right was absolute and above the law (actual wording of the court's holdings.) Most of America now believes that the government grants rights (sic) and that the Bill of Rights was to grant powers to the government over individuals. Specifically, that guy argues that "the people" mentioned in the Second Amendment refers to the government. All you have to do is read the First Amendment in order to debunk that... but the average reading skills of Americans precludes even that possibility when they have these self appointed gods of the Internet to tell you what a dumb ass I am. OMG! I spent decades working on this stuff and arguing points in briefs. The judges have never ruled on the merits of the case. Back in 2006 (?) I submitted a brief in defense of Hollis Wayne Fincher, a militia leader that built machine guns for his own use and to test the law, at the behest of his attorney. The court never ruled on any of the points of law we cited back then. They turned the whole thing into a case about a violation of the Interstate Commerce Clause. But, back to the topic at hand: After that clown ( Liquid Reigns) took up so many years of my life doxxing me and trolling me, I've grown weary of Internet Keyboard Commandos that live on the Internet in the hopes of preventing people such as myself from waking others up to what is going on. I'm sick and tired of the boards that protect these damn bullies. AND I remain convinced that it's like a lot of cop shows portray that you see with people and / or groups of disinformation agents working the computers to troll people and control the political narrative in America. We're winding down this board because Americans no longer start at the ground level and build up. They are content to stay on big boards where the mods and admins treat them like their personal bitches - and the posters actually enjoy it. They like to complain about the censorship, but they don't want to be in a place that allows one to express yourself without mommies and daddies deleting your posts and putting you in Facebook jail or some other such juvenile B.S. I've had it with the whole thing. I spent over FOUR DECADES learning the stuff I post about and there is nobody left alive with more hours clocked doing this stuff in the manner I did (i.e. using it in the courts and other venues where the real decisions were being made.) People need a government god to tell them when to wake up and when to go to bed and what to do in every waking hour between. Liberty and Freedom are archaic ideas that have no place in American society. I'm just too damn stubborn to accept that premise.
|
|
professorx
Global Moderator
Site Administrator
Posts: 413
|
Post by professorx on Oct 23, 2023 1:48:16 GMT
A lot of us are getting tired over the way things are going. Not many will take a stand. The plebs that get on the net and try to be snarky and condescending have made it miserable for a lot us that have a more serious use for the privilege of addressing others at any time of the day. Many feel your pain even if they do not post here. It probably takes a lot of guts to put your thoughts out there where they will not be deleted and you are stuck with what you say. For good or bad. What you say is what you own.
|
|
|
Post by noclevername on Oct 25, 2023 12:47:48 GMT
It is sad that you gents are winding down. I try to stop by and post. When others refuse to get involved here it makes it hard to justify posting when it takes a week for fifty people to read what I post. This place has served a nice way to call out the critters from other boards that think they can intimidate people without repercussions. Thanks for having provided a way for those locked out from making their point the opportunity to do so.
|
|