|
|
Post by The Resister on Jul 15, 2022 4:21:22 GMT
Ok. I am going to bring up something you won't like and won't agree with. When President Reagan was governor of Califonia There was a law, regulation, or proposition that he was against (I don't remember) that the majority of Californians were for. In the end, he gave in and said something to the effect of: "I am merely an elected servant of the people of California and have no right to go against their wishes." So if America wants to be atheist, globalist, socialist antigun and faggot, who are we to go against their wishes? It's what the majority wants. Obviously, it is in conflict with the ideals of our Founding Fathers but we aren't living in the America of those times. We are living in a totally different country with a totally different demographic. I can hardly find any White man who isn't a turncoat and the ones who aren't are, just repeating the same old Trump mantras without giving any thought to their ramifications. No, we don't like the new America so what can we do but focus on our own survival as it is imploding before our eyes? If I thought America were a democracy, I would agree with you. But, if you want to put a man to the ultimate test, give him power and see how he uses it. The older I get the more I live in the past. In 1999 we had, by the government's estimates, 1100 active militia personnel in Georgia. The Georgia Bureau of Investigation said for every person that was active, you could figure that another four people were supporters. That was the number of people in Georgia. Eventually we would branch out and people from all over the world were networking with us. I held one meeting and people came from eleven U.S. states and five foreign countries. People came from Tasmania, Australia, Armenia, Germany, and Denmark. We not only were affiliated with the militia, but the Patriot Network as well. A minority of the people wanted to follow the crowd in the early 2000s, but my own observations and experience dictated against going along to get along. The minority made it appear that we had these finite choices. That is part of the Hegelian method of brainwashing. We will talk about it in the thread. I refused to get involved in the anti-immigrant hysteria and sell out our fundamental principles for the accolades of those in power. The only people that stuck with me were those in State HQ and an officer that lives a three hour drive from me. The militia is but a shell of itself because we didn't cave in. The upside is, all of us are still free. Nobody went to jail; nobody went to prison; the government failed to recruit a single Confidential Informant from among that core group; none of our people were murdered by the LEO community. Today, movements rise up and die off rather quickly. ALL of my core group of people witnessed the era that is dying off right now, the Tea Party that preceded it, and the conservative / right wing / civilian militia " movement" that preceded that. I may be stuck on stupid, but I'm failing to see the wisdom of buying tickets to ride on the Titanic when you know how the story ends. Leaders lead, IMO. They don't go along to get along. Do the right thing and let the masses kick you out if that is what they want. You have to live with yourself each day. Real change has never come from among the masses. Real change has always come from a dedicated minority of people. Jesus had twelve apostles and he changed the world. Fifty six men stood together and signed the Declaration of Independence, taking on the world's superpower at that time. And at the other extreme you have to think about Hitler. He started off with a few boozers sitting around a table in a pub and with a country that is no bigger than our state of Texas (comprising less that 8 percent of world's land mass and fraction of the world population), he almost took over the world. I look at the way America was brought into existence. Very few people supported independence. But, when the colonists began to make inroads and become successful, enough people showed up to make the difference. “ In the beginning of a change the patriot is a scarce man and brave, and hated and scorned. When his cause succeeds, the timid join him for then it costs nothing to be a patriot.” Mark Twain |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 15, 2022 11:01:24 GMT
Ok. I am going to bring up something you won't like and won't agree with. When President Reagan was governor of Califonia There was a law, regulation, or proposition that he was against (I don't remember) that the majority of Californians were for. In the end, he gave in and said something to the effect of: "I am merely an elected servant of the people of California and have no right to go against their wishes." So if America wants to be atheist, globalist, socialist antigun and faggot, who are we to go against their wishes? It's what the majority wants. Obviously, it is in conflict with the ideals of our Founding Fathers but we aren't living in the America of those times. We are living in a totally different country with a totally different demographic. I can hardly find any White man who isn't a turncoat and the ones who aren't are, just repeating the same old Trump mantras without giving any thought to their ramifications. No, we don't like the new America so what can we do but focus on our own survival as it is imploding before our eyes? If I thought America were a democracy, I would agree with you. But, if you want to put a man to the ultimate test, give him power and see how he uses it. The older I get the more I live in the past. In 1999 we had, by the government's estimates, 1100 active militia personnel in Georgia. The Georgia Bureau of Investigation said for every person that was active, you could figure that another four people were supporters. That was the number of people in Georgia. Eventually we would branch out and people from all over the world were networking with us. I held one meeting and people came from eleven U.S. states and five foreign countries. People came from Tasmania, Australia, Armenia, Germany, and Denmark. We not only were affiliated with the militia, but the Patriot Network as well. A minority of the people wanted to follow the crowd in the early 2000s, but my own observations and experience dictated against going along to get along. The minority made it appear that we had these finite choices. That is part of the Hegelian method of brainwashing. We will talk about it in the thread. I refused to get involved in the anti-immigrant hysteria and sell out our fundamental principles for the accolades of those in power. The only people that stuck with me were those in State HQ and an officer that lives a three hour drive from me. The militia is but a shell of itself because we didn't cave in. The upside is, all of us are still free. Nobody went to jail; nobody went to prison; the government failed to recruit a single Confidential Informant from among that core group; none of our people were murdered by the LEO community. Today, movements rise up and die off rather quickly. ALL of my core group of people witnessed the era that is dying off right now, the Tea Party that preceded it, and the conservative / right wing / civilian militia " movement" that preceded that. I may be stuck on stupid, but I'm failing to see the wisdom of buying tickets to ride on the Titanic when you know how the story ends. Leaders lead, IMO. They don't go along to get along. Do the right thing and let the masses kick you out if that is what they want. You have to live with yourself each day. Real change has never come from among the masses. Real change has always come from a dedicated minority of people. Jesus had twelve apostles and he changed the world. Fifty six men stood together and signed the Declaration of Independence, taking on the world's superpower at that time. And at the other extreme you have to think about Hitler. He started off with a few boozers sitting around a table in a pub and with a country that is no bigger than our state of Texas (comprising less that 8 percent of world's land mass and fraction of the world population), he almost took over the world. I look at the way America was brought into existence. Very few people supported independence. But, when the colonists began to make inroads and become successful, enough people showed up to make the difference. “ In the beginning of a change the patriot is a scarce man and brave, and hated and scorned. When his cause succeeds, the timid join him for then it costs nothing to be a patriot.” Mark Twain There are three terms that I cannot stand - democracy, popular vote and melting pot. Only one out of 10 Americans even understand what the electoral college is for. They don't even understand it when I tell them that it is to prevent the tyranny of the majority and without the electoral college, politicians would only campaign in California, Texas, New York and Florida. Even after that, they still want to do away with the electoral college and just have a popular vote decide everything. Now we do not live in a democracy but then it's not quite a Republic either Even though individual states still can choose their own representatives. This brings up a big problem in my opinion. I do not believe that patriots or traditionalists will ever win at the ballot box again and it has nothing to do with my adamant belief that the last election was stolen. The demographics have changed too much were even the Republic is working against us. It's just hard to say right now since Even amongst all the degeneracy I'm starting to see the sane come back. The biggest change in political demographics right now is Democrats turning conservative. Even they have had enough of this idiot president who's approval rating is now under 30%. So yeah, maybe we do have a chance. The examples that you cited come from a different time when everybody was the same race and practically everybody was like-minded. Supporters who are not active or who do not donate time or money or not supporters in my book. Just to agree with the audiology and do nothing about it means nothing. Like you said, we can start by promoting parents to stop dragging their children and promoting people to start supporting the cause by just boycotting. We are living in very perilous times and have to be really smart about how we go about doing things. |
|
|
|
Post by The Resister on Jul 15, 2022 14:37:47 GMT
Ok. I am going to bring up something you won't like and won't agree with. When President Reagan was governor of Califonia There was a law, regulation, or proposition that he was against (I don't remember) that the majority of Californians were for. In the end, he gave in and said something to the effect of: "I am merely an elected servant of the people of California and have no right to go against their wishes." So if America wants to be atheist, globalist, socialist antigun and faggot, who are we to go against their wishes? It's what the majority wants. Obviously, it is in conflict with the ideals of our Founding Fathers but we aren't living in the America of those times. We are living in a totally different country with a totally different demographic. I can hardly find any White man who isn't a turncoat and the ones who aren't are, just repeating the same old Trump mantras without giving any thought to their ramifications. No, we don't like the new America so what can we do but focus on our own survival as it is imploding before our eyes? You're very good at what you do. I complain that we need to stay focused and in three posts you derailed this thread. Kudos. Maybe you know more about brainwashing than you really know. I answer one off topic question and the next thing you know we're into politics and no longer on the road where the OP began. If there is one thing that is going to make me abandon this board, you're looking at it in the last three or four posts. America was founded as a Republic not a Democracy; we no longer have a legitimate government, we have a bastardized government; the powers that be have figured out how to get the white race to commit genocide against their own kind, blah, blah, blah. That's not relevant to this thread. What IS relevant is the fact that there are techniques that the disinformation agents use that we know about and many we don't yet understand. One thing that I have to wonder about is how the system got people dumbed down to the place that they cannot stay on point. My critics find ten paragraphs to be an insurmountable task; my friends figure a way to turn every conversation back into the previous paragraph while ignoring the think tank objective of a topic. At least we know we have a problem that is universal between all the differing sides: FOCUS. We have no focus. Through this massive brainwashing scheme, we are so dumbed down that we can barely articulate the problem much less be able to solve it. We can wail about the successes of the left in destroying America OR we can start learning how they overtook this country and deal with it. A quarter of a century ago the right was winning the battles. We had both the 14th and 16th Amendments on the ropes; the abuses of eminent domain were being challenged; people were getting civilian militias involved in protecting private property along the border and so, we were dealing with the improper entry issue. The American people, by a majority, rejected National ID, globalism, SSN based ID, and a ONE WORLD GOVERNMENT / POLICE STATE. The right was winning! Then, as if someone flipped a light switch, the whole script was flipped and the far left was in control. Not only was the left in control, but they flipped the right. The right is now the standard bearers for the POLICE STATE. The right is wholly committed to the annihilation of the white people in America. The right is doing their dead level best to advance an Orwellian society. Why? In my mind I think that the people rejecting their God, making America Drug Nation USA, and losing their moral compass are the primary things white people did to themselves. How did the liberal / left wing / Socialist / Democratic Socialist / progressive / Democrat / Communist combine flip America so fast and with so much ease? That combine infiltrated the schools, the government, the news and entertainment media, and created a false narrative that the right not only now accepts, but doubles down and fights harder for than the combine does. If we aren't going to have a conversation about that topic, we may as well accept defeat, quit, and become willing subjects to the NEW WORLD ORDER because bitching about the symptoms will not fix the problem. |
|
|
|
Post by The Resister on Jul 15, 2022 15:33:40 GMT
The left has become masters at media manipulation. They are masters of telling us they are giving us news when, in fact, they are Political Action Committees. Here is a news story that tries to convince you they are asking how close we are to a civil war in the U.S.: www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/is-america-on-the-path-to-civil-war/ss-AAZBzFn?cvid=d55801a781704bb098d028862573e8f8&fullscreen=true#image=1Let's dissect this stuff for a moment and see how the news is not news, but propagandizing people (brainwashing) so that they accept liberal, anti-American " solutions" (as if regression is a solution.) First and foremost, most of the people on the radical right and those on the left are committed to the same, exact path of destruction without knowing it. For example, yesterday there was a Republican (and he may have been a former or current U.S. Representative) who claimed to be conservative that was of Mexican descent and he was trying to recruit Latinos to support the Republican Party. In the course of that appeal, he kept invoking the name of Martin Luther King, Jr. and King's scheme to have a multicultural society. This is a mainstream Republican on a conservative radio talk show extolling the virtues of a COMMUNIST and that communist's vision of an integrated America. White people accept this mantra and they chant it. The white people picked up the left's battle to register human beings by way of demagoguing foreigners (particularly from south of the border) and making the most baseless allegations known to God or man. And, to pretend they are fighting some kind of injustice, the whites have adopted the mantra of " enforcing existing immigration laws" as a proposed solution. The problem there is that those immigration laws were put into place to dilute the white vote and make the whites a minority. So, if that is what whites are willing to accept, what is the REAL basis for the left v. right battle that is raging in America? According to the above article, in the 1990s only 1 in 10 Americans believed that we were justified in having a civil war compared to over a third of Americans today. But, what are they fighting FOR? As the above news article continues they harp on those who think we should split the country up (which that OR civil war inside the U.S. IS NOT GOING TO HAPPEN.) Then we get to the real reason that story appears in today's news... GUN CONTROL. Their narrative is that there are 1.3 guns per American and that is the problem. So, how many guns should we be " allowed" to have before civil war isn't a concern? The reality is, the founders believed that if the citizens had more guns than the military, we would never be overtaken by a tyrannical government. But, that isn't relevant either. How did we get to the point that the right fully accepts socialist dogma and, as bizarre as it is, continues to act as if there is some major difference between the major factions? Unless we figure out that part of the equation, America will not last another decade. It may not be able to make it to the next election cycle. Next post and we can look at some more of the real puzzle: The Brainwashing of America. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 15, 2022 23:24:41 GMT
You're very good at what you do. I complain that we need to stay focused and in three posts you derailed this thread. Kudos. Maybe you know more about brainwashing than you really know You calling me a brainwashing expert for giving my opinion. After all I have done for you? I find that insulting, like calling me a turncoat. I'm no Indian giver so I will help you will your recordings as promised but this is my last post here. |
|
|
|
Post by The Resister on Jul 16, 2022 2:52:43 GMT
You're very good at what you do. I complain that we need to stay focused and in three posts you derailed this thread. Kudos. Maybe you know more about brainwashing than you really know You calling me a brainwashing expert for giving my opinion. After all I have done for you? I find that insulting, like calling me a turncoat. I'm no Indian giver so I will help you will your recordings as promised but this is my last post here. Suit yourself. I asked for ONE category on this entire board. You have your opinion on how to run a board; I have mine. You don't have enough confidence in your opinion to let me try my way in a single forum. One of the methods of brainwashing people is to repeat the same message all the time. Okay, I've done that here. But, I asked for ONE category on the whole board to do what the left does so successfully - KEEP ON POINT. You weren't satisfied to make the whole board about off topic material. Since you know better than me what works, you're the expert. If you're asking for an apology, forget it. I abstained from mentioning Trump at your request, but you wanted to take a dump on my part of the deal by reneging AND you are now threatening me? Really? Are you genuinely that much of an asshole? This was an important and serious subject. Now, it's degenerated into a pissing match. Instead of allowing this to be an opportunity for a butt hurt poster to derail this thread, let this be a learning opportunity. The people on the right turn against each other at the drop of a hat. Meanwhile, the left doesn't try to cover the world when they have an issue to discuss. They discuss THAT issue. They might fight like dogs in private, but how many liberal factions air their dirty laundry in public? If you have a problem with someone, the decent thing to do is take it up in PM. I did. And I negotiated a deal on the board that I was forced to build. One man could come in and ignore ALL the rules in every forum EXCEPT for the Strategic Think Tank. Here is where a man couldn't keep his word and invaded this thread, trying to derail a serious subject and now is threatening the man who gave him carte blanche to do whatever in the Hell he wanted to do EXCEPT derail threads in a single forum on the board. It gives us pause to think what the real problem is. The right cannot stay focused. I don't understand it, but this thread proved that something is wrong in the thinking process. The extremists on the right think that if you don't agree with every word and every nuance as they see it, that justifies making a scene, taking their Tonka trucks and playing in another sandbox. They don't post here for the same reason the left doesn't. People hate a level playing field and not being able to dictate the rules. Even when I compromised to meet the demands of ONE poster, that was insufficient. That one is gone; I will never make that mistake again. All new posters, if anyone ever shows up, will be bound by the rules of the board. We can now resume the thread. |
|
professorx
Global Moderator
Site Administrator
Posts: 413 
|
Post by professorx on Jul 16, 2022 18:01:16 GMT
It was entertaining to see a poster have a meltdown just because they were called out for continual abuses of the rules. Being honest about it the right seems more likely to stray from a topic than the left. The left gives their own more leeway to break the rules. This goes to the maturity of the poster. If you're going to challenge authority, at some point they will call you on it. The plan is for the right to turn tail and run. That seems to indicate that there has been a serious effort somewhere to condition people.
Public schools and our lack of morals in the current culture are ripping this country apart by the seams. The best way to fix any problem is to acknowledge that there is a problem. In the time since this board became active it has lost one poster who thought everybody should believe the same thing and another that couldn't respect the rules. There were times when the best of friends had disputes and swore at each other and maybe even went out behind the barn to iron them out. They didn't act like adults - by age - do in modern times. One area that parents left wide open were the public schools. Sexual deviants, atheists, Muslims, agnostics, socialists, progressives, and so forth are probably the most represented groups teaching children today. Parents do not screen to see who is teaching their children and they don't ask what those teaching their children believe in. It's time to find out what it is those in charge are doing.
|
|
|
|
Post by The Resister on Jul 21, 2022 14:42:36 GMT
The one thing that cannot be stressed enough is that all of us need to ask more questions. Who, what, when, where, why, and how are sentences we should be starting on a continual basis. Since we don't it makes it easy for those with ulterior motives to slant the way we think. A recent poll found that only 5 percent of Republicans and 35 percent of the Democrats trusted television news and newspapers: barrettsportsmedia.com/2022/07/08/poll-shows-trust-in-tv-news-newspaper-is-at-a-historic-low/This situation reminds me of WWE wrestling matches. The people know it's fake yet they watch it anyway - and even get emotionally involved. Politics is no different. We know that the news is basically B.S. and yet we watch it anyway. Sometimes we believe the news because they tell us what we want to hear. Either way, the information is slanted and the repetition of it is what gives it credibility. It's easier to believe a lie told a thousand times than a truth that nobody has ever heard before. Here, we will always question what the media says, so there are opportunities not to go down rabbit holes if you wish to pursue that possibility. Sometimes pollsters asked slanted questions in order to develop phony narratives whereby you will end up supporting a position you don't actually hold. For example, the media claims that 97 percent of the people support a Universal Background Check to purchase a firearm. It's a B.S. claim with no basis in fact; however, the pollsters do ask people if they support a background check to keep " felons from getting guns." So, you answer this question and you haven't considered the constitutional issues; haven't weighed the consequences of such actions; haven't asked what other options may be available. What do you think the real response would be if you asked a person: Would you support a background check for firearm purchasers, knowing that it can only be enforced if National Gun Registration and a National Gun Registry are implemented and strictly enforced? Worded that way, what do you think the numbers would say? Pollsters can ask questions in a manner to get the answer they want if there is a political issue they want Congress to vote a certain way on. It's a subtle form of brainwashing for the controlled news and entertainment media to suggest that " some people are saying" blah, blah, blah and it turns out the media are those unidentified " some people." |
|
professorx
Global Moderator
Site Administrator
Posts: 413
|
Post by professorx on Sept 21, 2022 20:29:48 GMT
It was sad that one poster tried to derail this and it wasn't being followed up on. There was a story this week about Congressional attempts to update the laws regarding the electoral college. news.yahoo.com/house-moves-toward-updating-electoral-203504821.htmlPardon me while I use some of Resister's way of explaining this with analogies and examples. Start out with the presumption that Donald Trump is a smart man and there is some kind of method behind the madness. Then expect that the result is what he intended. Trump has a history of being opposed to the electoral college and he thinks it is a threat to democracy. www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2019/03/20/donald-trump-backs-electoral-college-he-once-opposed-it/3220879002/Do any of you recall Senator John Kerry's infamous line that he was for it before he was against it? patch.com/michigan/bloomfield-mi/john-kerry The right had a lot of fun with that and kept asking where Kerry stood afterward. It used to be called flip flopping. Today Donald Trump is doing the same thing. What does Trump really believe? If you think he is smart then Trump is a democrat because his efforts have resulted in Congress being democratic and ready to weaken the electoral college and turn us one more notch toward democratic socialism. If you think Trump is smart we would expect that Trump read the book The Art of War. That means that the Jan. 6 rally was intended to help bring down the electoral college. It certainly gave the efforts a lot of momentum. If Trump did not intend for that to happen then he is not smart enough to employ simple strategies to get the public charged up about his agenda. Trump and the democrats want us to go to the direct election of presidents. That will end the republican form of government and bring an end to an era. It will signal the United States becoming a democratic socialist country and those who oppose the New World Order will be immediately taken out. If I presume that Trump is smart he employed political guerrilla warfare to aid the democrats in getting the electoral college put up for a debate and the chattering democrats all the ammunition they need to change our form of government. |
|
|
|
Post by The Resister on Sept 22, 2022 3:02:32 GMT
It was sad that one poster tried to derail this and it wasn't being followed up on. There was a story this week about Congressional attempts to update the laws regarding the electoral college. news.yahoo.com/house-moves-toward-updating-electoral-203504821.htmlPardon me while I use some of Resister's way of explaining this with analogies and examples. Start out with the presumption that Donald Trump is a smart man and there is some kind of method behind the madness. Then expect that the result is what he intended. Trump has a history of being opposed to the electoral college and he thinks it is a threat to democracy. www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2019/03/20/donald-trump-backs-electoral-college-he-once-opposed-it/3220879002/Do any of you recall Senator John Kerry's infamous line that he was for it before he was against it? patch.com/michigan/bloomfield-mi/john-kerry The right had a lot of fun with that and kept asking where Kerry stood afterward. It used to be called flip flopping. Today Donald Trump is doing the same thing. What does Trump really believe? If you think he is smart then Trump is a democrat because his efforts have resulted in Congress being democratic and ready to weaken the electoral college and turn us one more notch toward democratic socialism. If you think Trump is smart we would expect that Trump read the book The Art of War. That means that the Jan. 6 rally was intended to help bring down the electoral college. It certainly gave the efforts a lot of momentum. If Trump did not intend for that to happen then he is not smart enough to employ simple strategies to get the public charged up about his agenda. Trump and the democrats want us to go to the direct election of presidents. That will end the republican form of government and bring an end to an era. It will signal the United States becoming a democratic socialist country and those who oppose the New World Order will be immediately taken out. If I presume that Trump is smart he employed political guerrilla warfare to aid the democrats in getting the electoral college put up for a debate and the chattering democrats all the ammunition they need to change our form of government. Actually I didn't understand yamcha either. He helped build the board and we were thankful for that, but when we asked him to give us ONE forum on this board for serious discussions he blew a cork. He was the only person exempted from the rules and he was intent on dropping F bombs and using words we cannot legally use (at least in this jurisdiction.) You have to be the right hue of skin tone to say the N word. He did not come back to help in the podcast. He offered to help me learn it a few months ago when I was busy remodeling a house and didn't have any time. But, we're over that and back to this topic. We spend a lot of time busting Trump's chops, but the man did bring the criticisms on himself. He's either a brilliant double agent for the left OR he's the most incompetent man that ever led the right. Does he employ political guerrilla warfare against the right or is he really blind to the point that he cannot understand the long term ramifications of his actions? His moves have been calculated so as to do the most damage possible to the Republican Party. I said years ago that Trump was lying about his wealth. That is now pretty much a foregone conclusion. Those who used his in your face tactics (like Alex Jones) are now paying out multi millions of dollars. It's time for us to revisit the basics of Political Guerrilla Warfare. Let us begin with the most likely method whereby the right got conned. Many people have heard of Hegelian Dialectics. It's a simple formula. Thesis + Anti-Thesis = Synthesis. What is that? In the Thesis stage you create a problem In the Anti-Thesis stage the uproar, chaos, and controversy is created over the problem you create In the Synthesis stage you offer pre-planned solutions to the problem you create Trump was against the electoral college before he was suddenly " for" it, but his actions on January 6 has led to bi-partisan talks on how to " fix" the electoral college while the Democrats have all the power. That tells me if he is as smart as his supporters think he is, he just conned the right into bringing America a little closer to the Democratic Socialist nightmare that the Democrats want. Trump was against the electoral college. Where is his head at today? In Georgia, where Trump lost in a RED state, Trump said there was voter fraud. Yet, Governor Brian Kemp and Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger worked tirelessly to pass the most stringent voting laws in the United States. While that was going on, Stacey Abrams and now Senator Raphael Warnock were registering people to vote. In a case involving purging Georgia's voting rolls, Stacey Abrams, the judge in the case, ruled in favor of Stacey: www.foxnews.com/politics/georgia-judge-stacey-abrams-sister-wont-recuse-election-suit-rules-against-voter-purge-before-runoffsThat move allowed 4,000 questionable names to remain on the rolls. IF there were any voter fraud, Abrams and Warnock were clearly behind it. Yet, when Trump didn't win Georgia, he blamed Kemp and Raffensperger for the loss. Trump endorsed David Perdue, who dropped his U.S. Senate seat to a Democratic Socialist that had never held a real job, and Perdue made false claims about Brian Kemp in that race: www.cnn.com/2021/12/08/politics/fact-check-perdue-kemp-abrams/index.htmlPerdue lost the primary race to Brian Kemp and Donald Trump then endorsed Stacey Abrams over Brian Kemp in the governor's race: In just a few weeks, Brian Kemp or Stacey Abrams will be the next governor in Georgia. And Abrams is on the Trump bandwagon with talk of stolen elections: babylonbee.com/news/stacey-abrams-claims-the-2022-midterms-have-already-been-stolen/Bear in mind that Donald Trump is tight with Vince McMahon over at World Wrestling Entertainment. He knows how to pretend that he is adamantly opposed to the heel in a wrestling match in order to get some poor sap to trust him and then a wrestler gets Pearl Harbored and betrayed in an ambush. Whether by accident or design, a good case can be made against Trump if you presuppose that he was still against the electoral college just as he proved that he was still for gun control after denouncing it. If Trump used his theatrical skills and employed Hegelian Dialectics, it would explain why Congress is about to end the Republic and make us a Socialist Democracy before Lying Biden leaves office. It's time we learned how the game is played and pick legislators that are savvy enough to understand some basics. Trump created the electoral college issue with the election fraud allegations (Thesis) Trump built the chaos, divisiveness, and created the atmosphere for lobbying efforts to "fix" alleged problems with the electoral college (Anti-Thesis) When the electoral college is reduced to presidents being picked solely on a popularity vote, Trump will have won that fight (Synthesis) |
|
professorx
Global Moderator
Site Administrator
Posts: 413
|
Post by professorx on Feb 2, 2023 3:34:18 GMT
Ok. I am going to bring up something you won't like and won't agree with. When President Reagan was governor of Califonia There was a law, regulation, or proposition that he was against (I don't remember) that the majority of Californians were for. In the end, he gave in and said something to the effect of: "I am merely an elected servant of the people of California and have no right to go against their wishes." So if America wants to be atheist, globalist, socialist antigun and faggot, who are we to go against their wishes? It's what the majority wants. Obviously, it is in conflict with the ideals of our Founding Fathers but we aren't living in the America of those times. We are living in a totally different country with a totally different demographic. I can hardly find any White man who isn't a turncoat and the ones who aren't are, just repeating the same old Trump mantras without giving any thought to their ramifications. No, we don't like the new America so what can we do but focus on our own survival as it is imploding before our eyes? I really miss that guy yamcha. He did have a penchant for destroying threads by going down the same worn paths over and over. It was also a dirty trick to delete that old board without any warning. The Resister as well as I lost a lot of our work on that board. It was fun having been attacked by imaginethat and he couldn't believe more than one person could hold their own against his many sockpuppets pushing communist propaganda. But back to the point. Through manipulation and censorship there are limited ways of looking at any political issue with the globalists determining the talking points for both sides. If you look objectively you have Trump the globalist versus Biden the socialist democrat wanting to control you and both men going the same general direction. The only thing separating the major parties are minor squabbles over economic policies. Where we were a year ago is still where we are today. We are trying to figure out how to get a younger generation to become activists, leaders, preppers, survivalists, patriots, and Christians. Some younger people say they don't have the time their predecessors have. Social scientists called bs on that long time ago. Do you know how many hours the average person spends on the Internet per day? The real thing is that technology has changed society and it isn't for the best. Even small things are relevant to our future. If you notice people no longer collect autographs of famous people. They are content with a shirt or jersey of their favorite ball team. Who will want to collect that stuff years from now? Then there are tangible things that people collect for posterity's sake. Anything from old clocks and radios to signs are collectable. What do we preserve for history? Nobody collects old computers with floppy discs. There are bigger things too. The younger generation cannot fix their own car. Not even minor repairs. They can't cook. They call someone to deliver fast food. They have no other skills like changing an electric outlet in the home or running a snake thru the plumbing lines if something is stuck. Modern technology has created a dependent society. They see no value in being self reliant and self sufficient. It makes it easy for the one worlders to control todays youth. Let's acknowledge the problems and identify them. You can't fix what you cannot diagnose. |
|
|
|
Post by The Resister on Jun 29, 2023 20:02:55 GMT
I like to revisit dead threads every so often and this one is now almost a year old. What have we learned about brainwashing, mind control, and manipulation? We still have the Trumpeteers falling all over themselves as the manipulator cons and blackmails Republicans. People still fall for Hegelian Dialectics and repetitive mantras that don't coincide with the facts. One thing that Trump did was to challenge all Republicans to either stand up for him or be accused of being disloyal for not buying into his defenses on the criminal charges he's facing. It literally boggles the mind that one man with that much hatred for our Constitution is being coronated as the nominee for president. Be that as it may, the objective on this thread is to explain the brainwashing techniques and the Trump paradox almost defies all known logic. But on to more examples of the brainwashing. The years of repetitive misinformation led to the 1619 Project. Here is a classic case of the Blacks using The Big Lie technique to take over this country. According to Joseph Goebbels, Hitler's chief of Nazi propaganda: “ If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it. The lie can be maintained only for such time as the State can shield the people from the political, economic and/or military consequences of the lie. It thus becomes vitally important for the State to use all of its powers to repress dissent, for the truth is the mortal enemy of the lie, and thus by extension, the truth is the greatest enemy of the State.” www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/joseph-goebbels-on-the-quot-big-lie-quotOn virtually ALL social media the enemy of the state is the White, Anglo-Saxon, Germanic, Scandinavian, Teutonic and kindred people in the United States. If you disagree with the party line; if you object to the misrepresentations of history; if you promote your cultural heritage as one of those people the system WILL label you, castigate you, ridicule you, punish you and ban you from participation in the bigger social media platforms and in your everyday life. Speak out against what is happening and you may find yourself singled out and a news story just because you listened to the B.S. about diversity. Diversity... yeah right. If you don't buy into the dishonest mantra with regard of the Big Lie (where Whites caused the non-Whites have some magical powers over the Black people) then you are an enemy of the state. Click this link to see what happens that triggered the left into action: news.yahoo.com/confederate-flag-massachusetts-construction-triggers-091952535.html?guccounter=1&guce_referrer=aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuYmluZy5jb20v&guce_referrer_sig=AQAAAGZH5CVkY92mu-2Zop1zmhK9fKOV6cnc9iZz-RdO5d0U2Dcwa1qycI_eL3I0XEdhmrbTkx23sd17AaAV-tYWWx30aUIpY1U9aPWF3bOuZc5mw1azv8cx4aB9l_nu5DWlv1IYvR1PJxvi2Lk85dUbpZwI5LRN4GkDqHpnL72jvf70Really? A FLAG triggers these idiots and has them demanding that those who flew it be subjected to " diversity training?" Meanwhile they fly their rainbow flags while their own are sentenced for mass shootings: www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/colorado-springs-suspect-identifies-nonbinary-uses-pronounces-defense-rcna58499Who REALLY would benefit off of lessons in toleration? A guy flying a flag and preserving his cultural heritage is not near as dangerous as those who suffer an identity crisis that was manufactured by atheists, left wingers and sexual deviants. But, there we are every day with the left in our face with their intolerance, lies, deceit, treachery, and war of genocide. They are effectively using the Big Lie Technique. And it has the force of the government to continue. |
|
