Post by The Resister on Oct 26, 2022 19:00:11 GMT
In 1994 a questionnaire was administered at a military base at 29 Palms in California:
1776now.org/29-palms-combat-arms-survey-would-you-fire-on-us-citizens/
The questionnaire became controversial as it posed a disturbing question:
"46. The U.S. government declares a ban on the possession, sale, transportation, and transfer of all non-approved firearms. A 30-day amnesty period is established for these firearms to be turned over to the local authorities. At the end of this period, a number of irregular citizen groups and defiant individuals refuse to turn over their firearms to authority. Consider the following statement: [SD D A SA NO]
“I would fire upon U.S. citizens who refuse or resist confiscation of firearms banned by the United States government.”
If we return to 1994 we had all kinds of roadblocks with the feds and local governments doing what was then called Multi-Jurisdictional Task Forces. The federal government was increasing their power (albeit unconstitutional) over every facet of our lives. They began using federal regulatory agencies to impose and enforce unconstitutional laws. Even after a quarter of a century we are debating whether we should have a nationalized police force:
thenewamerican.com/nationalizing-the-police-is-not-the-answer/
Unfortunately for all of us, this idea isn't dying and all sides of the political aisle are excited to think about how a tyrannical government might be able to address their personal agenda. The government has been trying to get us to agree to the takeover; now we know what may come when it comes to enforcement.
1776now.org/29-palms-combat-arms-survey-would-you-fire-on-us-citizens/
The questionnaire became controversial as it posed a disturbing question:
"46. The U.S. government declares a ban on the possession, sale, transportation, and transfer of all non-approved firearms. A 30-day amnesty period is established for these firearms to be turned over to the local authorities. At the end of this period, a number of irregular citizen groups and defiant individuals refuse to turn over their firearms to authority. Consider the following statement: [SD D A SA NO]
“I would fire upon U.S. citizens who refuse or resist confiscation of firearms banned by the United States government.”
If we return to 1994 we had all kinds of roadblocks with the feds and local governments doing what was then called Multi-Jurisdictional Task Forces. The federal government was increasing their power (albeit unconstitutional) over every facet of our lives. They began using federal regulatory agencies to impose and enforce unconstitutional laws. Even after a quarter of a century we are debating whether we should have a nationalized police force:
thenewamerican.com/nationalizing-the-police-is-not-the-answer/
Unfortunately for all of us, this idea isn't dying and all sides of the political aisle are excited to think about how a tyrannical government might be able to address their personal agenda. The government has been trying to get us to agree to the takeover; now we know what may come when it comes to enforcement.
