The Plain Truth About Donald J. Trump

My initial first hand knowledge regarding Donald Trump and politics began in 1999. He joined the Reform Party while ex Navy SEAL Jesse Ventura, the professional wrestler with the gay persona for his wrestling character was THE Reform Party main attraction. 1999 was the same year that that David Duke (former Nazi turned KKK leader, turned Democrat candidate for public office, turned state representative, etc.) joined. It was / is literally inconceivable that Trump didn't know Duke as he claimed during his initial presidential campaign.

In the era Trump was accused of using so - called "fake electors" it was David Duke that contacted me saying he could show me how to become an elector. Here is a link to that (IMO) non-story:

www.cnn.com/2022/01/27/politics/fake-electors-explainer/index.html

In my mind, I thought Trump was actually helping the White Rights activists and denied knowing David Duke as part of a strategy of plausible deniability. So, I went along and supported Trump even though it was only because he was the lesser of two evils. In reality Trump is detached from social issues, letting all sides think he is on their side:

www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/trump-doesn-t-care-that-ivanka-is-jewish-as-he-hangs-out-with-anti-semites-former-lawyer/ar-AA158gOG

While the White activists think Trump is on their side, Trump's history is one of being pro-LGBTQP and anti-gun. We will explore this in upcoming posts. We can say this:

The pro-White activists, for the most part, are NOT the hatemongers and evil people portrayed by the media. They want to have their Rights equally respected and many blacks feel the same as Whites. That is why you have people like Ye and Nick Fuentes being able to sit at the same table talking politics and socializing. That pissed the race whores off to no end, but Trump is THE ultimate social liberal / economic conservative. Is that good or bad? You will have to wait until I get to the rest of the story.

TRUMP ON IMMIGRATION


When Donald Trump started running for office, not only was one of his campaign workers (David Duke) an ex Democrat, but Trump assumed a Democrat / National Socialist stance toward immigration. Trump wanted to build a "big beautiful wall" around the United States. To illustrate that this is NOT a Republican view, let me take you back to the 1980s:



And who was doing a hard line against immigration?



Immigration is a complex subject and due to the ignorance of the masses it is easy for the politicians to demagogue the issue. Politicians realize that they can promise you the sun, the moon and the stars on the issue; however, they know, for a fact, that the immigration officials and the courts have severely limited what the statutes can and cannot do. The politicians can pass laws and the president can promise whatever he or she likes. Then it gets tossed out in court and the political propaganda prostitutes on either side tell people what they want to hear.

With Trump, he had a hard line on immigration, but his own legal advisers were out telling people the truth:



Trump's own attorney... a former U.S. Attorney, tasked with working immigration cases pointed out that coming into the United States without papers is not a crime! I got booted out of the right wing for telling people the truth and telling them that they had to come up with a different approach. I get the boot and Trump's supporters act as if he's doing them a favor by LYING to them. Trump was NEVER going to do anything about so - called "illegal immigration." The man hired undocumented workers:

www.huffpost.com/entry/donald-trump-admits-hiring-illegal-immigrants_b_57da722fe4b0d5920b5b255e

I told the people over a quarter of a century ago that the wall would never be built. Now it is a demographic impossibility. The liberals are the numeric majority. Trump knows it. That is why he's shifted his argument into the phony election fraud story. Each issue I'm posting about is tied to a central theme. They are all interwoven. Trump denied knowing who David Duke was. Trump denies knowing that there are undocumented foreigners on his payroll. Trump promises things about immigration that he knows damn well cannot be done because the courts have the last say. And the United States Supreme Court has ruled that being in the United States without papers is not a crime.

The radical right has attracted so many dumb asses that they like to argue semantics, claiming that if you're here without papers that's proof you entered illegally. OMG at the stupidity! We are guaranteed the "equal protection of the laws" (see the illegally ratified Fourteenth Amendment) and nobody is going to spend thousands of dollars to prove someone committed a federal civil misdemeanor. It hasn't happened in the last quarter of a century since the nutty wall was started and it won't happen in the future. Everybody needs to come to grips with it and figure out what their REAL options are. Meanwhile, the Republican Party has begun going back to its socially liberal stance on the issue.

National Socialists (who used to operate as the so - called Minutemen Project circa 2004) conned the right into accepting the Democrat proposition that unless a person was a card carrying, background checked, subject of the NEW WORLD ORDER with a Socialist Surveillance Number ...oops "Social Security Number" aka National ID Card then they shouldn't be in the United States. It would be the narrative needed to get the right to take up the narrative to justify submitting to the ultimate POLICE STATE. That narrative saved the IRS and the income tax from extinction when the Fair Tax had so much traction. It save the illegally ratified 14th Amendment as well. And, yes, the immigration laws the Trump supporters want to enforce were passed to commit subtle genocide against the white race. They don't serve any other purpose.

At the end of the day Donald J. Trump does have an end game. Once we've exposed him that will become apparent.

I will tell you my presuppositions up front:

The Declaration of Independence states:

"We hold these Truths to be self-evident, that all Men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness"

Liberty is an unalienable Right. While CITIZENSHIP was limited to "free white persons" just after the ratification of the Constitution of the United States, there were no such creatures as citizens of the United States as no such entity existed at the time the Declaration was penned. Therefore, the unalienable Right of Liberty is bestowed upon all of us by our Creator (our God, whomever we deem that to be) and the privilege of citizenship is limited by law. Citizenship is not an unalienable Right.

Donald Trump supports the National ID / REAL ID Act - E Verify, 24 / 7 /365 womb to the tomb surveillance of the American citizenry in the ultimate POLICE STATE. He is not a conservative, Republican, American patriot nor a Christian. The immigration issue is a highly complex one as stated and it would deserve a thread of its own if you want to fully understand the technical details of how the left has used the ignorance and sometimes outright stupidity of Trump supporters to con the right into taking up the left's banner and making it their own. "Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye compass sea and land to make one proselyte, and when he is made, ye make him twofold more the child of hell than yourselves." Matthew 23: 15

TRUMP, THE FOURTH AMENDMENT AND MORE 2 A STUFF

"The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized." Fourth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States

In this context I bolded papers as they would be inclusive of your records stored in electronic media. When you tell people that you want to search their background in order for them to exercise an unalienable Right, you have forfeited the unalienable Right in favor of tyranny. There is nothing reasonable about searching a person's background and destroying the presumption of innocence in order to exercise an unalienable Right. Where would it stop? Do you need the government's permission to watch a specific tv show? Join a certain religion? Read certain materials? Access certain websites? Where is the reasonableness in checking out a person's background in order to exercise an unalienable Right? There is none.

There is nothing to be accomplished in denying you your unalienable Rights except to deny such Rights exist and that the government owns you. And yet Donald Trump says:



Take the guns early? Then give a person due process? You've heard the old saying something that would make a preacher cuss. Well get ready. Here is a minister responding to Trump. What in the Hell is this rapid due process BULLSHIT? Take the guns early? Do extensive background checks? Actually background checks in order to exercise a constitutional Right are patently unconstitutional regardless of what any de facto court in America rules. Trump says he told the NRA "we have to do something."

Okay, let's do something. Let's take these unconstitutional measures off the table and solve the freaking problem. I studied how to resolve gun violence beginning in 1989 when, on my birthday, a crazed gunman went nuts in Stockton, California killing 5 children and wounding 29 others as they were enjoying some time on the playground of a school. That's been almost 34 years ago. I studied the problem; offered solutions; had those solutions analyzed, criticized and scrutinized. When I found something unconstitutional about a proposition OR if it jeopardized a Right, I went back to the drawing board. Over the last quarter of a century NOBODY has put forth a reason why we cannot enact those measures that will save lives WITHOUT gun control and WITHOUT the possibility that the measures could be used to gain some kind of back door gun control.

On the Internet, people make fantastical claims about the solutions without asking a single damn question. In twenty five plus years I had ONE person ask me for an explanation. When he got it and couldn't beat me in a debate, the board I was on (which is left wing anyway), deleted my post and banned me. The right treats me no better. But, here is the real deal: I went to law school and became adept at legal research. I worked as a DFACS asset (Dept. of Family and Children Services) so I know what their policies are, what they can and cannot do, and have witnessed things we can do within those parameters to virtually eliminate mass shootings. I know how to do it; Donald Trump knows I know how to do it, but insists on going with left wing solutions that want to benefit the gun control crowd.

Eliminate mass shootings and it has a trickle down effect on a lot of other shootings. It is preventative. But, we don't want to discuss it. I've tried for years. Since we don't, even some of Trump's supporters buy into the liberal gun control crap. If you dealt with those guys ages 18 to early 20s that commit mass shootings BEFORE they left school, you can solve the problem. Take Nick Cruz for example. He was the mass shooter in Florida that killed 17 people and injured 17 more. He had, at a minimum, 49 interactions with the police (violence, threats, harm to small animals, etc.) not to mention expulsions and suspensions at school. At some point probable cause existed to get involved and help that kid. Yet we'd rather wait until the damage is done. OR we want laws that allow liberals and disgruntled spouses / girlfriends use the system to disarm legitimate gun owners and they be required to prove they are legal and nonviolent citizens.

Trump supports Red Flag Gun Laws. Call it rapid due process or anything else, it is what it is. It has its roots in something sinister and we will be covering it before I'm finished. If the Fourth Amendment is not worth protecting, we may as well burn the Constitution and give up.

THE ELECTORAL COLLEGE AND ELECTION FRAUD

In 2018 Donald Trump voiced his support for popular elections:

www.nationalpopularvote.com/president-trump-reaffirms-his-long-standing-opposition-electoral-college-and-favors-nationwide-vote

"The electoral college is a disaster for a democracy." Donald Trump tweeting 11:45 PM · Nov 6, 2012

Today, all of a sudden, Trump is pro-electoral college... or is he? Maybe he is playing someone. After looking at the previous post, it became apparent that now is the time to talk about this part of the expose.'

Trump is for democracy, then he isn't. He is for gun control, but tells us he isn't. He lies about who he knows be it David Duke or Nick Fuentes. We try to blow it off, knowing full well the majority of people realize Trump is a liar. When in office Trump stabs gun owners in the back and joins the liberals. He tells us he is this "Art of the Deal" guy, but with a majority Republicans in the House and Senate, he can't get his immigration agenda passed. And... and... and in the mid terms he loses the House then the Senate along with the presidency. Donald Trump was the first president to lose both Houses of Congress AND the presidency in a single term since the Great Depression!

Psychologists and psychiatrists say that "past performance is the best indicator of future behavior" (credit given to Dr. Shill the tv psychology guru) Whether it's been the electoral college, gun control, the Fourth Amendment or any other issue we've discussed here TWO things have consistently happened: Trump has played both sides of the fence AND the right has always come up short. He is either highly incompetent or exceptionally dishonest. With respect to fraud allegations at the ballot box, it is the liberals who are cashing in.

The fact that Trump never gave a speech extolling the virtues of a Republic, but has invoked the word "Democracy" repeatedly should be a strong indicator as well as what happens when Trump has control. Trump promised the sun, the moon and the stars with immigration, but failed to deliver. Why? It's because he knew, in advance, what portions of his plan would ultimately be over-turned in the courts, rescinded by the next president and / or otherwise ended up meaning nothing.

Let's talk Election Fraud:

On this issue I bought into a lot of what Trump said; however, the election fraud thing has gone on long enough without some acknowledgments. The first acknowledgment is that the liberals are multiplying like rabbits while the right is dying off due to old age and a generation that is deluded into believing they are gay, non-binary, etc., etc. Now, let me tell you that I live in the state of Georgia. Georgia passed the most stringent voting legislation in the United States. Instead of praising the leadership that brought that to fruition, Donald Trump lied about them and waged a war against the most conservative state in the U.S.

Round ONE - Trump endorses Kelly Loeffler for the U.S. Senate and causes her to lose to Raphael Warnock:

news.yahoo.com/trump-reportedly-told-kelly-loeffler-173800709.html

Round TWO: Trump backs David Perdue, the one term U.S. Senator that lost his seat to a young Jewish kid that ran around with a camera and fancies himself as a community organizer. That wet behind the ears brat has never held a real job in his entire life

Round THREE: Trump tried to put undue pressure on Georgia's governor and secretary of state to "find" him a magic number of votes and push him over the threshold and win in Georgia. As was explained to Trump, what he wanted was unconstitutional (under Georgia state law.) Trump then failed to make the appropriate complaint in a timely manner, served upon those who could help him. Trump attacked Brian Kemp and Brad Raffensberger, accusing them of voter fraud. Trump then endorsed David Perdue, the single term U.S. Senator (whose record was so bad he lost to a man with NO work record in the real world.) Kemp easily defeated Perdue. Kemp's whole fight seemed to be a referendum over Trump's allegations. That was the substance of Perdue's argument. Then Trump endorsed Stacey Abrams over Brian Kemp:

nypost.com/2021/09/25/trump-lashes-out-at-georgia-gov-brian-kemp/



Let me see here:

Donald Trump backs marginal candidates in Georgia that lose to Democrat nobody types. He falsely accuses Gov. Kemp of not doing enough to secure Georgia elections while the voting requirements in Georgia are the most stringent in the U.S. Then Trump runs his marginal candidate, David Perdue who loses in a landslide to Gov. Kemp. Still pissed off, Trump endorses Stacey Abrams. Now, IF there were any election fraud going on, Stacey Abrams was behind it. Stacey Abrams went to court over fraudulent practices, but the judge dismissed the case. The judge was Stacey Abrams sister. But, Trump worked hard to get Stacey elected as revenge against Brian Kemp. Donald Trump turned Georgia blue and we were a state that hadn't had any Democrats in power since Ronald Reagan. This election cycle is our last one where Republicans retain any semblance of political clout. BTW, if somebody wanted to argue this post, know that I Brad Raffensberger, the Secretary of State, is a personal friend. I'm not reading news articles on this one. I've spoken to many of the principal parties AND read a lot of the court documents in order to get at the truth. We're getting toward the end of my posts exposing Trump.

My mother was born in 1929. The first Socialist Security Cards ... I mean "Social Security Cards" were issued in 1936 and then only when you went to work for a company that withheld income taxes. Across the bottom of the card were the words ""FOR SOCIAL SECURITY PURPOSES -- NOT FOR IDENTIFICATION." In the last thirty five years we have gone from a country that rejected National ID to one that thinks we can't get along without it. Donald J. Trump has the right clamoring to join the far left socialists by imposing the ultimate POLICE STATE. There is NO excuse for the 24 / 7 / 365 womb to the tomb monitoring and criminal background check, credit check, Interpol check, MVR check, hunting license, fishing license, driver's license, occupation license, social media background check, blood test, pee test, hair sample, Socialist Security Card, National ID Card mentality inherent in the POLICE STATE.

Yet that is exactly the bill of goods that people like Donald Trump sold a gullible public. We supposedly "need" it because of voting irregularities or we "need" it to prevent so - called illegal aliens from exercising their unalienable Rights. Funny thing. The United States existed from 1789 until 1936 without the Socialist Security Card which is almost 150 years AND we didn't have voter ID cards until 1950. So, here is my point:

ALL of the societal problems that we have happened AFTER we started going toward a POLICE STATE mentality. If you asked the average person when America started losing its greatness, it would be after 1950 and most likely in the early to mid 1960s when all this tyranny began to take hold and they started outlawing our Liberty. Civil rights, the Kennedy Immigration Law, busing, affirmative action, racial quotas, removal of prayer in the public schools, the nonsensical "separation of church and state" claptrap, the legalization of inter-racial marriage, the Genocide Treaty, hate laws, gun control, etc., etc. ad infinitum were a social experiment that proved to be a failure. Yet we expect someone with the mentality of Donald Trump to Make America Great Again by passing more and more laws to insure that the left has more and more control to impose themselves in the private lives of the Posterity of the founders of our country and framers of our Republic. Why don't we believe in looking back to when America was great and begin REPEALING some of these onerous laws?

America continues to live in a state of denial. On my way home today, this was what Erick Erickson said regarding Trump and his Covid policies. You HAVE to read this:

redstate.com/joesquire/2022/12/14/desantis-hits-trump-where-hes-weakest-without-mentioning-trump-at-all-n673477

In short, the man that doesn't understand the Constitution, doesn't know the people that he's met and worked with and don't know how they get invited to meet with him is probably not qualified to be president regardless of his presupposed beliefs. He has flip flopped on the issues and attacked the very people that put his MAGA agenda in place. Trump attacked Gov. Kemp over opening up Georgia during Covid 19. Then Trump endorses DEMOCRAT Stacey Abrams who also criticized Kemp over opening up Georgia for business during the Covid deal. Trump lied about Gov. Kemp and Secretary of State Brad Raffensberger after they oversaw the most stringent voting bill in the United States. Trump demands loyalty and obedience from all that seek his endorsement. You cannot think independently nor act without the consent of Trump IF you seek his blessings. He is nothing more than a tyrant that is cozy with people that are affiliated with the Council on Foreign Relations. He is a Democrat that is a financial conservative / social liberal. He wants his own political party and he wants to be the supreme leader. He does not believe in Liberty; he loathes Freedom; he has no regard for unalienable Rights.

It is time to open your eyes and pay attention to Trump for who he is and what he is. And if you'd like to debate any aspect of this thread, by all means POST. Silence only indicates that you agree with this assessment.

I posted and as suspected, the only people that want to discuss the issue are Trump supporters. Their problem is that they want to debate me via e mail. They are too embarrassed, even using a board name (where their identity is protected) to make the charges against me public. Others, on other boards, derail the thread because I won't do the thread on boards where my work is inevitably deleted as no board wants to have the discussion we expected on this board.

There is something that we need to have a clear understanding about so that it will never be challenged by serious researchers:

More than 25 years ago I warned people about the proposed solutions the right was adopting. National ID / REAL ID Act - E Verify led to the pretext of fighting so - called "illegal immigration" at a cost of dismantling the gains made by constitutional patriots over the previous twenty five years before the right fell victim to the political propaganda of the left. The right got this warm and fuzzy feeling they were getting something done.

The reality is, the proposed solutions were carefully designed to implode and make the situation worse while killing off the resistance. The average Trump supporter lacks the requisite critical thinking skills and doesn't have a clue as to what I just typed. The nutty wall idea resulted in delays and jockeying and never got built. AND once the hoopla got started, immigration went into high gear, creating a situation that is irreversible without an internal war... and the right cannot even organize a simple militia!

On gun control, Trump has a history of supporting it and he promised the left that he'd get the right to go along... which he did. To add insult to injury, the Trump people doubled down on their sell out. Oh, we don't care about bump stocks, we have to keep guns out of the hands of criminals, etc., etc. ad infinitum. In every instance Trump's policies were calculated to be temporary and the push back made the original issue much worse than it was. Trump continues to lead the sheeple into Hell and they are glad to be on their merry way. If you point out that Trump isn't who they think he is, they say you have Trump Derangement Syndrome - and all the while they suffer from Trump Worship Syndrome.

Trump probably will never go to jail, but he will not be president of this country - EVER. It's time we started looking for new leadership. When a man's supporters cannot publicly defend his actions, you know something is wrong.