Post by The Resister on Apr 9, 2023 3:11:06 GMT
30 March 2023 - Insurrectionists storm the Tennessee Capitol over gun control: www.msn.com/en-us/news/other/in-tennessee-or-d-c-there-is-no-excuse-for-mobs-inside-capitols/ar-AA19Da74
So, I went onto another board and found people talking about a topic where they will be censored and their opinions removed. I'm giving my .02 cents worth and challenging them to see if they are for real OR simply blowing smoke. This is where I stand personally:
If there had been anything to gain in the Jan. 6 rally in Washington Wonderland, I'd have been there even though I'm NOT a supporter of Donald J. Trump. So, as an activist, I do not shun confrontation. That rally got out of hand and (with the help of misguided people) that event is being labeled as a insurrection. Today, the liberals pretend to be mad that they are being called out for what went on in Tennessee and WHY they did what they did. How about some honesty for a change?
In Tennessee, the state legislature considered the topic of gun control and the liberals lost. Unwilling to accept the will of the people, they tried to take over the Tennessee Capitol. State legislators participated in the action which included using bullhorns and intimidation to "demand" that something be done (sic) and the left wants gun control. I bolded that for a reason and we will come back to it. To be honest, America was never intended to be a democracy. The Constitution of the United States provides that "the federal government shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government..." (Article IV Section 4 of the Constitution.) But, the will of the people, the majority DID reject gun control and IF the liberals respected that institution of democracy (majority rule - mob rule) then they should have obeyed the rule of law and the rules of the Tennessee House of Representatives.
The message by those legislators was not about saving the lives of children. Most of you who will end up reading this know who I am. I am the only swinging soul that has a plan to PREVENT the misuse of firearms that cost lives - and ESPECIALLY when the shooters are younger people. The advocates for gun control are not about saving lives; they are about control. Gun control is not crime control. Gun control does not prevent crime. It does not save lives. It merely allows people to trade essential Liberty for the promise of temporary Safety. Banjamin Franklin once said something to the effect that those who would trade essential Liberty for the promise of temporary deserved neither Liberty nor Safety. The reason he said that is once you give up Liberty you have forfeited your Safety. So, who were those nutjobs in Tennessee?
If you look at them they are black, Democrats with their hands raised in a clenched fist. Here is the identifying trademark of WHO we're talking about:
"The use of the fist as a salute by communists and antifascists is first evidenced in 1924, when it was adopted for the Communist Party of Germany's Roter Frontkämpferbund ("Alliance of Red Front-Fighters"). ...its use spread through the United States in the 1960s after artist and activist Frank Cieciorka produced a simplified version for the Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee: this version was subsequently used by Students for a Democratic Society and the Black Power movement. ...The raised fist logo represents unity or solidarity, generally with oppressed peoples. The black fist, also known as the Black Power fist, is a logo generally associated with Black nationalism, Black pride, solidarity, and socialism. Its most widely known usage is by the Black Panther Party, a Black Marxist group in the 1960s."
(Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Raised_fist)
The liberals can spew that B.S. that this is about saving lives and they can lie to you and crouch it in terms of protecting children, but the reality is, the don't give a rat's ass about saving lives. For close to FOUR DECADES (since I was a kid) I have researched, written about and lobbied for PREVENTATIVE MEASURES that would have prevented most mass shootings, but if you want to watch a liberal sleep, get them into an actual discussion about ways to reduce the misuse of firearms so that we save lives. They are snoozing the moment that we take the concept of gun control out of the equation. So, I'm highly offended when the left lies to me and tries to pee down my neck and tell me it's raining. The topic is not about saving lives; it's about control. Liberals are making America safe for communist control.
Lastly, no legislature, no president, no court and no state has the AUTHORITY to infringe upon the Right of the people to keep and bear Arms. The Right to keep and bear Arms is a pre-existing, natural, inherent, irrevocable, non-transferable, God given, absolute, unalienable Right that is above the law making power. I've proposed the only way to resolve the issue of the misuse of firearms:
resisters.freeforums.net/thread/9/dramatically-reduce-mass-shootings
I've invited a number of people to the table on this issue. I'm betting that NONE of them has what it takes to enter this conversation.
So, I went onto another board and found people talking about a topic where they will be censored and their opinions removed. I'm giving my .02 cents worth and challenging them to see if they are for real OR simply blowing smoke. This is where I stand personally:
If there had been anything to gain in the Jan. 6 rally in Washington Wonderland, I'd have been there even though I'm NOT a supporter of Donald J. Trump. So, as an activist, I do not shun confrontation. That rally got out of hand and (with the help of misguided people) that event is being labeled as a insurrection. Today, the liberals pretend to be mad that they are being called out for what went on in Tennessee and WHY they did what they did. How about some honesty for a change?
In Tennessee, the state legislature considered the topic of gun control and the liberals lost. Unwilling to accept the will of the people, they tried to take over the Tennessee Capitol. State legislators participated in the action which included using bullhorns and intimidation to "demand" that something be done (sic) and the left wants gun control. I bolded that for a reason and we will come back to it. To be honest, America was never intended to be a democracy. The Constitution of the United States provides that "the federal government shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government..." (Article IV Section 4 of the Constitution.) But, the will of the people, the majority DID reject gun control and IF the liberals respected that institution of democracy (majority rule - mob rule) then they should have obeyed the rule of law and the rules of the Tennessee House of Representatives.
The message by those legislators was not about saving the lives of children. Most of you who will end up reading this know who I am. I am the only swinging soul that has a plan to PREVENT the misuse of firearms that cost lives - and ESPECIALLY when the shooters are younger people. The advocates for gun control are not about saving lives; they are about control. Gun control is not crime control. Gun control does not prevent crime. It does not save lives. It merely allows people to trade essential Liberty for the promise of temporary Safety. Banjamin Franklin once said something to the effect that those who would trade essential Liberty for the promise of temporary deserved neither Liberty nor Safety. The reason he said that is once you give up Liberty you have forfeited your Safety. So, who were those nutjobs in Tennessee?
If you look at them they are black, Democrats with their hands raised in a clenched fist. Here is the identifying trademark of WHO we're talking about:
"The use of the fist as a salute by communists and antifascists is first evidenced in 1924, when it was adopted for the Communist Party of Germany's Roter Frontkämpferbund ("Alliance of Red Front-Fighters"). ...its use spread through the United States in the 1960s after artist and activist Frank Cieciorka produced a simplified version for the Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee: this version was subsequently used by Students for a Democratic Society and the Black Power movement. ...The raised fist logo represents unity or solidarity, generally with oppressed peoples. The black fist, also known as the Black Power fist, is a logo generally associated with Black nationalism, Black pride, solidarity, and socialism. Its most widely known usage is by the Black Panther Party, a Black Marxist group in the 1960s."
(Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Raised_fist)
The liberals can spew that B.S. that this is about saving lives and they can lie to you and crouch it in terms of protecting children, but the reality is, the don't give a rat's ass about saving lives. For close to FOUR DECADES (since I was a kid) I have researched, written about and lobbied for PREVENTATIVE MEASURES that would have prevented most mass shootings, but if you want to watch a liberal sleep, get them into an actual discussion about ways to reduce the misuse of firearms so that we save lives. They are snoozing the moment that we take the concept of gun control out of the equation. So, I'm highly offended when the left lies to me and tries to pee down my neck and tell me it's raining. The topic is not about saving lives; it's about control. Liberals are making America safe for communist control.
Lastly, no legislature, no president, no court and no state has the AUTHORITY to infringe upon the Right of the people to keep and bear Arms. The Right to keep and bear Arms is a pre-existing, natural, inherent, irrevocable, non-transferable, God given, absolute, unalienable Right that is above the law making power. I've proposed the only way to resolve the issue of the misuse of firearms:
resisters.freeforums.net/thread/9/dramatically-reduce-mass-shootings
I've invited a number of people to the table on this issue. I'm betting that NONE of them has what it takes to enter this conversation.
