|
Post by The Resister on Apr 18, 2023 20:47:16 GMT
Tomorrow is Patriot's Day - April 19 - It all began with the shot heard around the world on 19 April 1775. The Minutemen rose up and defied the soldiers of King George. The rest is history.
Today I'm welcoming people, especially those from a board called ND (I won't give a board that censors content a free plug) and this post will not be my usual fare. As we commemorate that fateful date in history, it gives me cause to respond to the critics of our country and get some things set straight. On this board called ND there are a lot of drive by liberals that make a lot of unsubstantiated charges against the Posterity of the Constitution. In the instant case, one smart ass, calling himself Jon Gee, had things to say to me that he would never repeat to my face. And I despise that board when they allow drive by trolls to make allegations and irresponsible statements that deserve an answer, but we are not allowed to address. Here, people cannot run; they cannot hide; they are called into accountability. Let's start:
A poster on ND, John Macikowski, started a thread that starts out: "I for one, do miss the America I grew up in. I even miss the America my kids grew up in."
Many of us miss the America we grew up in - ESPECIALLY for those who were born in the 1950s, 60s and, to a lesser extent, the 1970s. America was a different country. We were not plagued by the drug epidemic, mass shootings, divorce, sexual deviation and the incessant attempts by liberal trolls to control everything in America. In my neighborhood you could leave your doors unlocked at night and the keys in the car. I remember my elders sitting on the front porch, drinking ice tea and waving at cars as they went by (even when it was people they didn't know.) When I was on ND we were not allowed to take that trip down Memory Lane because a few hood rats like Jon Gee pretend they want to talk about racism, sexism, and attitudes toward the LGBTQP community. When you call these mentally diseased trolls out, they laugh and run. They get to make irresponsible statements and then exit the conversation because they realize they are liars and incapable of defending their morally and ethically depraved point of view.
I just called those pabulum puking political propaganda prostitutes out. And, now, I will post again telling you my view of the America that used to be and how those trolls are destroying the last vestiges of our Republic. See my next post.
|
|
|
Post by The Resister on Apr 18, 2023 21:33:35 GMT
Rather than to allow people to reminisce about the good old days, you have disrespectful left wing liberals that say things to the effect that they hope we aren't talking about that America that supposedly engaged in racism, sexism and wasn't kissing up to the LGBTQP community - as if the white people needed to apologize for some of the things in the past that have been misrepresented. There comes a time when the B.S. stops and the truth comes out. Let me take each of their issues and deconstruct them. RACISM It is an indisputable FACT that America was founded by white Christians AND for the advancement, preservation and protection of the white race. Within weeks of the ratification of the Constitution of the United States, Congress passed the first immigration law. It limited citizenship to "free white persons." Inter-racial marriages were outlawed and were never fully made legal until 1967. The rich owned slaves (and they still do.) Homosexuality was considered both a sin and a socially unacceptable practice. Now, if you're trying to force yourself onto others and you don't get your way, it is tempting to use emotionally charged buzz words like racism, white supremacy, sexist, etc. to get what you want. It's cowardly, disingenuous and hypocritical unless you are waging a war of political propaganda. So, let's be fair and let's be honest. Yes, the United States practiced slavery; HOWEVER, slavery was never legalized in the Constitution nor by the federal government of the United States. The liberals are confused by the facts. They want to hold the white man's feet to the fire on this issue whilst they ignore the truth. The truth is, the first case of a runaway slave in the United States was that of a white man with a black master. But, again, never let the facts stand in the way of you learning the truth. While there was slavery in the United States, the Americans didn't invent that institution. It was being practiced throughout the entire world when America was being founded. But, we only want to hold the whites accountable for that institution. Adding insult to injury, blacks demand reparations for slavery, but they don't ask them of their African ancestors that sold them to the white slavers. They don't even target the white slaving traders through their descendants. Noooo. They want their reparations to come from the taxpayers. That is because hatemongers such as those who hang with the NAACP hate, loathe, and despise anything that is connected to white Christian culture. Maybe those victims of their own hatred should know where all of this programmed hatred comes from. on 7 June 1957, Rep. Thomas Abernethy read into the Congressional Record an excerpt from the book A Racial Program for the Twentieth Century: " We must realize that our party's most powerful weapon is racial tensions. By propounding into the consciousness of the dark races that for centuries they have been oppressed by whites, we can mold them to the program of the Communist Party. In America we will aim for subtle victory. While inflaming the Negro minority against the whites, we will endeavor to instill in the whites a guilt complex for their exploitation of the Negroes. We will aid the Negroes to rise in prominence in every walk of life, in the professions and in the world of sports and entertainment. With this prestige, the Negro will be able to intermarry with the whites and begin a process which will deliver America to our cause." The defense was that the book never existed; it was a hoax, etc., etc. ad infinitum. Yet 66 years later, black liberals engaged in an insurrection in Tennessee are photographed using the clinched fists that are associated with their real political leanings: patch.com/tennessee/memphis/both-expelled-black-lawmakers-have-now-returned-tennessee-houseLet's identify those clenched fist seditionists: " The raised fist, or the clenched fist, is a long-standing image of mixed meaning, often a symbol of political solidarity. It is also a common symbol of communism, socialism, and other revolutionary social movements. ...
The raised fist logo represents unity or solidarity, generally with oppressed peoples. The black fist, also known as the Black Power fist, is a logo generally associated with Black nationalism, Black pride, solidarity, and socialism. Its most widely known usage is by the Black Panther Party, a Black Marxist group in the 1960s.[18] A Black fist logo was also adopted by the northern soul music subculture. The fist and rose, a white fist holding a red rose, is used by the Socialist International and some socialist or social democratic parties, such as the French Socialist Party and the Spanish Socialist Workers' Party" en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Raised_fistFor YEARS the liberals have been lying about what this ruckus is all about. I'm just starting and will eventually get to the sexist arguments and the positions held by the LGBTQP community. But don't let the truth stand in your way. I do want to clarify the slavery issue so that you can see how it's being manipulated. Let's have a real and honest discussion for a change... Next post is coming really soon.
|
|
|
Post by The Resister on Apr 19, 2023 2:13:45 GMT
Now, I would presuppose I have your attention. We can have a real conversation since you made it through the first two posts. Let's talk objectively about slavery. I'm not so sure you can make a wholly " moral" argument against it. That would require that you know what it really IS. Correct? I'd like for you to look at something and think about it: "4 So Abram departed as the Lord had spoken to him, and Lot went with him. And Abram was seventy-five years old when he departed from Haran. 5 Then Abram took Sarai his wife and Lot his brother’s son, and all their possessions that they had gathered, and the people whom they had acquired in Haran, and they departed to go to the land of Canaan. So they came to the land of Canaan." Genesis 12: 4 I've often wondered if slavery per se were so bad, how come God didn't stop Abraham. How come the practice continued? But even today we are held in a form of slavery with a Socialist Surveillance Number... ooops " Social Security Number" where a government god steals over half of what we earn and controls our lives from the womb to the tomb. And we accept it! But I digress. Our reality is that when slavery existed in the United States, it was a common practice all over the world. Under our Constitution, however, the framers of the Constitution did address the issue from a federal standpoint: " The Migration or Importation of such Persons as any of the States now existing shall think proper to admit, shall not be prohibited by the Congress prior to the Year one thousand eight hundred and eight, but a Tax or duty may be imposed on such Importation, not exceeding ten dollars for each Person." Article I Section 9 of the United States Constitution So, as of 1808 the slavers could no longer bring slaves into the United States. That means the federal government was never accountable for slavery. But, the federal government allowed the states to do it, right? Well, not exactly. Anything that is not the whole truth is a half truth and if it's less than the whole truth, it is a lie. The fact of the matter is, slavery was a world wide institution. Not only was the federal government bound by the chains of the Constitution to allow for slavery, but it's hard to tell Americans that a practice around the rest of the world is wrong - especially a practice that is as old as the Bible itself. Be that as it may, the rich owned slaves, but we have to put this into perspective. The average slave ate better, had better housing, better medical care, dressed better and was paid more than their white skin, blue collar indentured servants. Not only that, but white indentured slaves had a shorter life span. Most indentured servants were treated so poorly they never lived long enough to gain their freedom. And all of this is well documented! Yet black supremacists want to penalize ALL whites in order to exact some measure of revenge for what they believe are slights that pertain only to the white race. Additionally, the people who wail about slavery seem to forget that not only did whites NOT invent slavery, but roughly half the states outlawed slavery before the ratification of the Constitution. Let's not let the facts get in the way of the liberals hate filled agenda. Still, I'm questioning the whole concept of condemning slavery when the masses will choose it democratically IF they get to choose who their oppressor is. I'll wait to see who, if anyone, challenges me before saying more about slavery. I've not even warmed the engine on the many misconceptions surrounding that issue. Next post and I'll give you some undisputed facts about DISCRIMINATION.
|
|
|
Post by noclevername on Apr 19, 2023 11:25:42 GMT
This is interesting. Just need a little information that you might be able to shed some light on. It is believed that the book A Racial Program for the Twentieth Century never existed and it is an antisemitic hoax. Can you shed some light on this if it don't take you far from where this thread is going?
|
|
|
Post by The Resister on Apr 19, 2023 16:17:52 GMT
This is interesting. Just need a little information that you might be able to shed some light on. It is believed that the book A Racial Program for the Twentieth Century never existed and it is an antisemitic hoax. Can you shed some light on this if it don't take you far from where this thread is going? Thanks for the question. I wanted to do a response while pondering my next post (and I will do it later today God willing.) The critics say that Israel Cohen never existed and that the book A Racial Program for the Twentieth Century never existed. The issue then becomes, did Rep. Abernethy quote that from a book OR did he make it up? Far too many other people over the years quoted from this supposedly non-existent book. As you know I wrote several editions of the Militia of Georgia Handbook. I dare you try and find a copy OR a mention of it anywhere. Our system has always existed on censorship. Then take into account that the popular novel 1984 was NOT written by George Orwell. It was written by Eric Blair under a pen name. If you self publish a book, it might not be found in the Library of Congress. There are a host of explanations for why they cannot produce copies today. The left also says that the Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion are forgeries. When Henry Ford was confronted by that, he said something to the effect that it fits what is going on today. After 66 years from the time that Rep. Abernethy introduced that excerpt into the Congressional Record, the program has proven to be 100 percent accurate. Explain that. If you still believe that Abernethy was a fraud promoting a hoax, let me tell you about Rep. Abernethy. He was a United States Representative that was elected 15 consecutive times... as a Democrat.
|
|
|
Post by The Resister on Apr 20, 2023 0:03:54 GMT
RACISM Part II
I heard from Internet tough guy Jon Gee on the other site. He sent me a link to an old Oprah show that featured some of the people from the 1987 Forsyth County marches. I knew most of the people that spoke on that show, having met them many years ago. Mr. Tough guy has not responded to me now that he knows that I'm well aware of who is who in the political world when you talk about the good old days. He said I wasn't qualifed; not on his level. What that half wit doesn't know is that I knew anyone who was anyone up until the early 2000s. From the mid 1970s to about 2006 (over thirty years) I appeared on radio, tv and public forums discussing and debating racial and social issues with people like Hosea Williams, Jesse Jackson, J.B. Stoner, David Duke, Al Sharpton, Don Black, etc., etc. ad infinitum.
But, with me, I look for perspective. The controlled news and entertainment media is out to sell narratives. Chaos sells, divisiveness brings in the revenue and if it bleeds it leads. That is their motto. The media is left wing, biased, socialist and opportunistic among other things. So, they create a narrative. I'll take this stroll down Memory Lane just to show what really goes on. The year was 1987. It was cold and there was snow on the ground. A man came to town in Cumming, Georgia. He was a martial arts teacher (or at least he thought he was.) The guy starts a racial confrontation with a "Brotherhood March" in the predominantly white town. Needless to say, it went over like a fart in Sunday school. It raised the ire of locals who called in the Ku Klux Klan and any other honcho that wanted to be on tv. There was a march; the blacks got pelted with dirt clods and called the N word. They came back a couple of week-ends later and put 30,000 blacks in a town where marchers outnumbered residents by quite a lot as I recall.
That gave rise to lawsuits and the SPLC along with Hosea Williams sued Don Black, David Duke, Frank Shirley, David Holland, and others for civil rights violations. They even named me. Then a judge told Hosea Williams he could drop me from the suit or the judge would dismiss the whole thing. Needless to say, Hosea dropped me from the suit, and got a million dollar judgment from the participants. Okay...
There is much more to the story, but the point is that some white guy came into town wanting to pit black against white. Both sides took the bait, but you have to ask yourself. What did the people of Cumming, Georgia owe to the black community? The answer is, most likely, NOTHING. Liberals are programmed, Pavlovian style, to believe that they've been wronged; whites should not have their own homeland; have nots have some kind of special right to impose themselves and demand from the haves (and many haves earned what they have.) They talk about slavery, discrimination, racism, etc., but those are facts of life and not exclusive to the white race. America gives billions of dollars so that the Israelis can have their own homeland, but taxpaying whites are not entitled to the same consideration for even small communities that are not living off the government for their lifestyle. On a world scale, the Chinese are 98 percent + Han Chinese; Koreans are 98 + percent Korean; the Japanese claim to be the most racially pure race in the world. Add to that in Zimbabwe, 99.7 percent of the population is black. We have no problem with the world having cultural integrity, but deny it to ourselves.
Most of the pretexts go back to slavery. But, reality check: the Chinese didn't have it so good, but they created their own enclaves in the United States and they either assimilate or they create Chinese communities in the U.S. I spent a few days in Chinatown in San Francisco. Hispanics work around the system and they get along just fine. The descendants of indentured servants in America have built their own communities and rose up above poverty. There was such an influx of Germans into the New World there were talks of limiting how many could become citizens. Some people used to call Italians wops and they were treated like crap. Adding insult to injury, the left denies the fact that white indentured servants had it harder in early America than the slaves. But, here is what gets me. Instead of belittling whites, the liberals and racist blacks could just leave white separatists to their own communities. But, they can't. They try to deny them their history; the liberals try to rewrite historical narratives to fit their own persecution complex. Yet they don't come to an honest conclusion: They aren't going to change everybody's minds, so why not live and let live? They only have one "truth" and that is their own personal perspective. Despite nearly two centuries of using force to get their way, there is still "racism" and the blacks along with liberals are always chattering about some healing (sic) process.
What we have not witnessed from these people that are filled with hate and intolerance is the ability to move forward. Their world revolves around worshipping a perceived victim status and the need to eradicate white Christian culture. It's strange. They never own their part in their inability to assimilate and succeed. And people like the hood rat who thinks I'm not qualified to give an opinion isn't fit for citizenship in a free country that guarantees Liberty for all. Next time I'll address discrimination and move forward.
|
|
|
Post by The Resister on Apr 20, 2023 22:43:05 GMT
DiscriminationJim Crow, segregation, racism, bigot, Nazi, and people using the "N" word. It's become all too common to use those emotional laden buzz words to justify a campaign of genocide against the white people in the United States. The advent of color pictures and then video was able to create a narrative for the liberals and the truth doesn't play much of a part in the modern world. Add to that the specter of political propaganda. It makes for an interesting mix. People can show you video of blacks being hosed by the fire department; they can show you white people marching with their Confederate flags shouting the dreaded "N" word. "Oh how ugly it was!" they proclaim. What the media does not splash on tv screens is the acts that caused the white people to commit such egregious responses. Let's take the case of people being hosed during the civil rights era. They refused to obey police in the performance of their duties. You're going to do the time if you commit the crime. Whites figured they deserved what they got as their actions were illegal. Fast forward a quarter of a century. Whites marched in Forsyth County, Georgia in 1987. They were detained and held outside where there was snow on the ground. So, the media didn't make a big deal out of it. It still happened. During that era I saw some cops flip a wheelchair over and they injured a handicapped man. But, he deserved it. Right? After all he was a white supremacist. We only support that equal protection of the laws when others are promoting a ONE WORLD / ONE RACE / ONE RELIGION agenda. Everything else is heresy. Right? Let me stop for a moment. When I've witnessed black people get wronged, I've had to stand up for their Rights so while my critics are hiding on ND or one of the big " discussion boards" where they can't be accountable for what they post, I can safely say they are lying hypocrites (which is why they don't respond on this board.) At least you now know, right or wrong... the people in those old videos boo hooing about civil rights were breaking the law. Sometimes you have to suffer to win, but once you've won the fight is over. You don't get to keep beating someone down once you've reached your political objective... EXCEPT, the objective of the left and the blacks they've conned is to eradicate whites and their values. I want to be brutally honest here because ND (and other boards) have taken down my posts and some have banned me for posting the truth. This is the unvarnished truth. It's not being told to hurt anyone's feelings or make anyone else look bad. It is not discriminatory or harassment. It is the TRUTH.America was founded by white Christians who were concerned with their Freedom of Religion and their own unique culture. Within weeks of the ratification of the Constitution of the United States, Congress passed it's first immigration law. It reads (in part): "Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America, in Congress assembled, That any Alien being a free white person, who shall have resided within the limits and under the jurisdiction of the United States for the term of two years, may be admitted to become a citizen thereof..." www.mountvernon.org/education/primary-source-collections/primary-source-collections/article/naturalization-acts-of-1790-and-1795/As most black supremacists can tell you, miscegenation (inter-racial) marriages were outlawed and never fully legalized until 1967. Now all of this true and the narrative in this country is that this is proof that America has some " racist" and ugly past that is unforgivable. Supposedly the people were motivated by greed, hate, avarice, bigotry, etc., etc. I'm sorry, but they are wrong - dead wrong. As I pointed out slavery was already being practiced in most of the world and was not exclusive to those in the United States. But, let's go further: The white Christians who came to America believed that they were the Israelites of the Bible and that America was the New Jerusalem. Therefore, cultural integrity was mandated by no other than God. The Bible does not allow for mixed marriages, non-Christians as political leaders, or non-whites as citizens. The Jews practice the same, exact thing and nobody on either side of the political side condemns them - mostly on the false assumption that they are the Israelites. But whites compromised and put the black people into positions of power; extended the privilege of voting; tried to make them political " equals." And the courts misapplied the illegally ratified Fourteenth Amendment to create two classes of citizens: Preamble Citizens and Fourteenth Amendment citizens. Preamble Citizens retained their God given unalienable Rights and Fourteenth Amendment citizens are entitled to privileges and immunities. The Fourteenth Amendment NEVER mentions rights. Read it. They aren't in there even once. If you study case law revolving around the Fourteenth Amendment it rarely has anything to do with blacks and citizenship; rather, it focuses on "the equal protection of the laws." But what laws? The courts ruled that the Fourteenth Amendment incorporated the Bill of Rights into its provisions. Sooo... while we are guaranteed the equal protection of the laws, NOBODY (now) is presumed to have unalienable Rights. If you're black, you got double screwed by the system. You traded one slavemaster (rich white guys) for another (a ONE WORLD SOCIALIST GOVERNMENT.) You're owned either way. It is going to take a lot to convey my sentiments on discrimination - and who knows, one of my critics may grow a pair and try pushing that hatemongering swill they attack me with at ND so I'll stop here and do another segment tomorrow.
|
|
|
Post by The Resister on Apr 21, 2023 20:40:24 GMT
Discrimination Part II
There is one thing about people in general that is true. We all want to belong and we want to belong to the best. Kids and even adults will spend hundreds of dollars on t-shirts, jerseys, etc. that have the name of their favorite sports team or maybe player just to be associated with what they believe is the best. Yet if someone believes their race is somehow "better" then that is racism and that translates into some kind of wrong that is worse than being a pedophile or a murderer. I'm just putting some perspective on this as I have something blunt to say about discrimination in the end. You see all my life the liberals have been spewing this nonsense that race is a "social construct" and whites should be ashamed of thinking in terms of race.
So race is supposed to be a social construct and yet the black people have Black History Month, Kwanzaa and other celebrations that are unique to blacks. In the stores I've seen magazines like Jet, Ebony, Black Stars, etc. and on tv we have a station called "Bounce" that is geared toward black actors and there is even the Black Entertainment Awards. Once, when the city of Atlanta had an all black city council, they crowed and bragged about that. And they want to tell me that race is a social construct. Yeah, right. Okay. You know, I don't begrudge them that, but they should know that when they tell me race is a social construct, I feel like they are peeing down my neck and telling me it's raining. Adding insult to injury, when blacks don't win an Emmy, Oscar or Grammy they are are crying the blues and complaining about how they got ripped off. Whites simply prefer the acting styles of people that look like them just as blacks preferred the acting of their fellow black people enough to complain about it. As I observe it, race does exist and since in most cases than not, people prefer their own race so racism is a natural and inherent characteristic. Nothing evil about that.
Before we can tackle the issue of discrimination, we have to define terms. One that comes to mind is prejudice. Prejudice is the act of making a judgment without thought, knowledge or reason. From a racial perspective, many of the details have been lost over the last half century ago, but our predecessors believed that interracial marriage was a violation of God's laws. The details of WHY interracial marriage is lost in the political propaganda and censorship that have separated whites from the moral absolutes practiced by their ancestors. In that narrow sense most are not qualified to tell you a good reason they oppose interracial relationships - then again, since they have a the freedom to believe whatever they like, they shouldn't have to justify their feelings. I'm only explaining the roots of why people have a resistance to interracial relationships. Fifty years ago most segregationists could give you a laundry list of WHY they opposed integration. Since they used thought, knowledge and reason it cannot legitimately be called mere prejudice. The fact is black genes are more predominant over white genes by a ratio of 4 to 1. Globalists pushed interracial marriages and relationships because integration was a guaranteed way to commit genocide against the white people. And blacks have been taught a false narrative about slavery, so they feel justified in participating in the genocide AND refusing to assimilate into white Christian culture.
Modern churchianity lives in mortal fear of Jews. They suffer them even when they are the epitome of evil (people like Chuck Schumer, Dianne Feinstein, Bernie Sanders, etc.) and to oppose them in any way, shape, fashion or form is some kind of heresy of which you can burn in Hell for. When whites lay the same claim to being Israelites; when they say they believe that America is the New Jerusalem; when whites do not believe in corrupting their culture through miscegenation they are called racists and hatemongers. The double standard goes right back to the bottom line roots of this issue. At the end of the day black people want to punish the white race by destroying their culture, changing our form of government and eradicating the race over a misunderstanding about slavery and this issue of discrimination. Now we get to the nitty gritty.
Slavery was rough. I won't deny that. However, as pointed out the United States never legalized slavery. The federal government merely honored a practice that was the norm at that time in history. And, by the time of the ratification of the Constitution, roughly half the states had outlawed slavery. Then add to the fact that most of the people left did not own a slave. It was a practice for the rich. I never owned a slave; my father never owned a slave; neither did any of my grandfathers. In my family tree, only one person owned slaves. That was Arthur Middleton, a signer of the Declaration of Independence and chief architect of what became known as the American Revolution. His estate was ravaged by the British and he was thrown into prison and held in Saint Augustine, Florida. He was released and rebuilt his empire only to lose it a second time to the ravages of war during the War of Northern Aggression (aka Civil War.) In my opinion, since he lost anything that might have been gained via slave labor and nobody in my family ever inherited any wealth, I don't owe black people for slavery. At least NINE out of every 10 white Americans are in the same boat. But just before responding to the discrimination issue, I think we need perspective.
When I was growing up I went to a school where grades 1 - 6 were held in one room and grades 7 - 12 in another. We had woodstoves, outdoor toilets, and ate our lunch at our desk. Lunch was prepared by the teachers, one of which was the main cook, the other served as the principal. The house I lived in did not have indoor plumbing and just before winter we had to mix up mud to put between the logs to keep out the cold weather. At about the age of 8 I recall drinking my first soda. It was a Mountain Dew. It is an experience that will live with me forever. Many of the men in my family worked in coal mines and most never made it past their 40s before black lung took them out. Others were farmers, rising before the sun came out and working until the sun went down. Most of the time my mother bought me three pairs of pants from Sears called Huskys (jeans in different colors.) I got a couple of shirts for going back to school and that was my entire wardrobe. Most of the time we literally lived off the land. On average I had a little worse than most people who grew up in the late 1960s, but about average for the generation just before me and those before that. Many whites recall a similar lifestyle. So, when all these snowflakes start talking about white privilege, I don't know what the Hell they're talking about.
By the time you got to the 1970s there was busing, affirmative action, racial quotas, racial preference hiring schemes, etc., etc. Whites were literally locked out of jobs. One year I was laid off my union job and they had to make room for blacks to take X number of jobs. I didn't feel any white privilege then. And afterward, my race became a detriment to finding a decent job. Just as I turned 40, employers would tell me I was "over qualified." When my stomach gets empty, it doesn't understand overqualified. They should simply be honest. I was too old and had white skin. I became Hispanic and that took care of that problem. Most of my life I've had the "privilege" (sarcasm intended) of paying property taxes and funding the education for people that didn't pay property taxes. I've made way for liberals and Democrats to have the jobs and I've paid the taxes to get their kids through school and that is a "privilege" that they can stick up their butt for all I care. Yes, it really was a thing In fact in one case, Regents of the University of California v. Bakke, 438 U.S. 265 (1978) the United States Supreme Court found that preferential racial schemes were unconstitutional. However, it still persists to this day. Must be more of that "white privilege."
That brings me to discrimination. Many black people who were sold that communist swill that whites are holding them down genuinely believe that if they aren't accepted, it is the white man's fault. But, as an example, black people prefer hearing blacks versus whites when it comes to music. Dolly Parton puts out a song and it is selling millions, but she lets Whitney Houston release the same song and now blacks make the sales soar even more. You mean it wasn't just as good as when Dolly put it out? OR, did people use their ability to discriminate in order to determine what they wanted? Some guys like skinny chicks and others prefer those with some meat on their bones; some people like country music and some like rap; some don't want to associate with Muslims while others say that racists offend them. There it is. Discrimination is a natural characteristic. Dare I say that discrimination is, most likely, an unalienable Right? The only way that the left has been able to keep the ONE RACE agenda going is through the barrel of a gun and / or at the risk of stealing private property, imprisoning people, and killing them. So this is where I stand:
The whites have a problem with me when I hire Hispanics to work for me. They think I owe them a job. They are, after, National ID Card carrying subjects of the NEW WORLD ORDER with a Socialist Surveillance Number ... I mean "Social Security Number." And where I stand right now is that I hired Hispanics to work for me and in one case, a Jew works for me. And then I provided some work to three white guys. Between them, not only did they screw up the jobs I hired them to do and I ended up doing them, but they also stole my tools, antiques out of my basement and other collectibles. My retirement went to fund illegal drugs that I don't believe in. The thing is, I gave them a chance so the loss is on me. But, I have a Right of Association and the Right of Disassociation. I hire whomever I please. If someone wants to discriminate against you on the basis of religion, color, political ideology - or anything else, unless the government or someone else is giving them money, they have a natural Right to choose. THAT is in the subconscious of every American. So, if they don't want to rent to you or hire you - or date you or do business with you, that is their Right. You might be able to get the government to play mercenary and force yourself on some of them, but in my case I do what I want. I worked for it; I earned it; I owe no one for what I have. I'll rent to whomever I choose and hire the person best suited for the jobs offered. I buy and sell to people on a voluntary basis. If the law is any different, I'll pay about as much attention to it as you do the speed limit when you're late for work. If the government tried to force me to rent to someone I didn't want to, I'd burn the house to the ground before the government or some other parasite took possession of it. If they tried to tell me who to hire or not hire, I'd shut down before giving in to such an indefensible position. Nobody owes you a living and if you're having a problem with where you are, you can always assimilate OR you can go somewhere that has people or practices that don't offend you. So, now those trolls that tell other whites not to read my posts; to those too chickenshit to register and discuss the matter; to those who lie about me; to those that misrepresent me; to those who banned me or deleted my posts on other boards, they can kiss my white ass. I just posted my position and they cannot do anything about it.
|
|
|
Post by noclevername on Apr 23, 2023 1:04:42 GMT
Amazing. The board almost dies and you responded to trolls that ran up the view counter to 100 views on this thread. Great going. There are a couple of things that should be documented just for the record. When you said that slaves in the U.S. had it better than slaves in other countries and better than indentured servants here there were no links. You know how some people are. If you don't have a link they do not believe it's true. You also talked about hiring Hispanic people and very little about others. Please elaborate.
|
|
|
Post by The Resister on Apr 23, 2023 13:56:29 GMT
Amazing. The board almost dies and you responded to trolls that ran up the view counter to 100 views on this thread. Great going. There are a couple of things that should be documented just for the record. When you said that slaves in the U.S. had it better than slaves in other countries and better than indentured servants here there were no links. You know how some people are. If you don't have a link they do not believe it's true. You also talked about hiring Hispanic people and very little about others. Please elaborate. The most authoritative books on how blacks were treated in the U.S. and how whites were also slaves are "Time on the Cross - the Economics of American Negro Slavery" by Robert William Fogel and Stanley Engerman: archive.org/details/timeoncross00robeThe original has a second volume that documents their sources and is proof of how indisputable the work really is. The other book is " They Were White and They Were Slaves - the Untold History of the Enslavement of Whites in Early America" by Michael Hoffman II archive.org/details/they-were-white-and-they-were-slaves-the-untold-history-of-the-enslavement-of-wh/THE%20WHITE%20SLAVE%20VOL.%203/Click the links and read the books if you want facts you've never heard of before. I bought a house and started rebuilding it. Then I was put out work due to health reasons and have had to hire people to help me do some projects on the house. I've gone to a LOT of places advertising for help and you generally get three stereotypical guys that will come over: The first is Bubba with his 6 miles per gallon gas hog and a dozen employees. Since he is licensed, bonded, insured, approved, and has umpteen expenses just to get out of bed, he charges more per hour than my surgeon. Straight up, it pisses them off, but I can't afford those guys. They can't even show up at your house for less than a thousand dollars. Then there are the cigarette smoking, tattoo wearing rednecks that can't pass a drug test for a job. I have hired them and every one of them wound up either doing a crappy job and / or stealing from me. This last round has made me decide never to hire a drug addict. They took more in tools than the job was worth - even at Bubba's prices. I won't live long enough to make enough money to replace what they've stolen. That leaves Hispanics. And I don't care about whether they have papers or have licenses. They have done the work, maybe barely acceptable, but they've done it at a price I can afford. So, whatcha gonna do?
|
|
|
Post by The Resister on May 19, 2023 18:52:36 GMT
I want to add to this today due to the fact that on the discussion board I refer to as ND, I had a poster named Freddie Collins challenge me there knowing full well that my facts would be deleted on that site. Anyway, the guy calls me a coward and claims I won't take him on there. ND has made it unequivocally clear that they won't tolerate "political" discussions. But, here is the difference: I am taking him on there AND I'm here... where he is too chickenshit to make an appearance. Sorry to have to be blunt and crass, but nice guy doesn't work in this debate.
Unfortunately, the Black people in America have been programmed, Pavlovian style, to believe that they have a monopoly on human misery. If you challenge them on it and show them how idiotic the narrative is, they think you have committed a sin that is more unforgivable than rejecting the Holy Spirit. They will not discuss the matter with you; they will not concede when you make a point; they will never forgive you for what they think is a personal slight. It's about time for some truth in this discussion:
The point has been made earlier that America did not invent slavery. However, the states within the United States were the first in modern history to outlaw the practice as the rest of the world was (and had been) practicing it for eons. That seems not to matter to the hatemongers on the left. By the time of the ratification of the Constitution, over half the states had already outlawed slavery. As if that weren't enough, when compared to other countries, the United States treated its slaves more humanely than any other country. Sure, Black people have made a virtual religion of documenting how rough they had it, but they deny that poor Whites and, especially, White indentured servants had it just as bad - and worse. If you want to be honest, you have to put the history into perspective. Here are some things Mr. Collins can't relate to:
When America became a nation, most of the world was practicing slavery. It was a practice that probably predates the Bible. We know that in the Old Testament that Abraham had slaves. We know that people owned slaves in the New Testament. You have to have context if you want the truth. So, with the rest of the world practicing slavery, it wasn't as controversial as the issue is today. When the states entered into the Union, the people had Rights that were protected by law. The Tenth Amendment provides:
"The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people"
Right, wrong or anywhere in between, slavery was not a federal issue AND the federal government had no authority to tell the states that they couldn't practice slavery. When the War of Northern Aggression (aka the Civil War) broke out the political issue was slavery, but the bottom line is that the legal issue was about the federal government dictating to the states in matters that were protected by a constitutional guarantee. All moral arguments aside, that is the reality. Let's draw an analogy based upon what liberal Blacks do. Liberal Blacks accept the help of pedophiles and homosexuals when they march against the White people. They don't ask what their sympathizers believe or disbelieve. If the supporters hate the Whites, that is the only qualification. When the war began over the political issue of slavery, many Americans sided with the south because slavery was already accepted and the underlying issue was the federal government violating the Constitution and outlawing an institution that existed before the ratification of the Constitution and not addressed in the ratification of the Constitution. Since slavery was not specifically prohibited, the feds had NO constitutional authority to step in and try ending it. More to come...
|
|
|
Post by noclevername on May 20, 2023 15:11:49 GMT
Having gone and looked at the other board this is what it looks like. Freddie Collins prefers to hide behind others as ND is majority black. He is figuring on other blacks to root him on and if he starts to lose the left wing moderators will delete posts that make him look silly. He is afraid because here he can post and be on a level playing field. Everybody that is interested can get the whole story not just that part the left thinks should be told. If a person knows their position don't hold water it is best to avoid serious discussions. The fact that black extremists cannot admit they do not have a corner on the market when it comes to human misery is very telling. Billionaire blacks want to waste 14 trillion taxpayer dollars on reparations. www.businessinsider.com/bet-founder-billionaire-calls-for-reparations-black-americans-2021-6#:~:text=1%20Robert%20L.%20Johnson%2C%20America%27s%20first%20Black%20billionaire%2C,bill%20that%20would%20set%20the%20stage%20for%20reparations. These people want freebies for a condition they were not remotely affected by. Even if Freddie Collins does not post here it would be a blessing if some more factual info was posted.
|
|