Critical Race Theory -

This is typical for your efforts R. I see the view counter at 39 and know some of the CRT supporters have been here. It is a very good strategy to point out that the left thinks anything critical of them is MAGA and none of the administrators or moderators on this board are connected to Trump except to expose him. That is a lot different than the left that is connected to the NAACP and communists. If they weren't loyal to the communists they would find some other spokesman and some other approach. That is my view. Anxiously waiting to see where you go from here.

Racism is difficult to resolve (continued)

If there were ever any doubt as to what was on the minds of the founders, framers, and statesmen who founded the United States and drew up its Constitution, it was made abundantly clear in the case of Dred Scott v. Sanford which was decided by the United States Supreme Court. In that decision, Chief Justice Roger Taney wrote:

"The words 'people of the United States' and 'citizens' are synonymous terms, and mean the same thing. They both describe the political body who, according to our republican institutions, form the sovereignty, and who hold the power and conduct the Government through their representatives. They are what we familiarly call the 'sovereign people,' and every citizen is one of this people, and a constituent member of this sovereignty. The question before us is, whether the class of persons described in the plea in abatement compose a portion of this people, and are constituent members of this sovereignty? We think they are not, and that they are not included, and were not intended to be included, under the word 'citizens' in the Constitution, and can therefore claim none of the rights and privileges which that instrument provides for and secures to citizens of the United States."

www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/60/393

That decision was handed down in 1857 and was the catalyst for the illegally ratified Fourteenth Amendment. Any White person who has not read that decision is UNQUALIFIED to criticize any side in this discussion / debate. But, that means I just proved that America was started by Whites for their mutual support, protection, and advancement... sooo... it's racist. Right? Suppose it is. Then why are the nonwhites in the United States STILL buying stuff from China, Korea, Japan, etc. that are equally "racist?" What makes any other people different than the Whites in the United States of America? How come that the Whites are prohibited from having their own homeland? To ask such a question is "racist." Right?

That I ask such a question is all the proof that the left needs to subvert the Constitution and deny to me the First Amendment Right of Freedom of Speech and Freedom of the Press. They label it as "Hate Speech" and silence anyone who dares to challenge the status quo. They pretend to be offended and use their degrees in Victimology to feign fear from anyone that dares challenge the current narrative. Then they can muster up those crocodile tears and rant about slavery and "America's dark past." My response is, What a load of absolute HORSE MANURE!

In 1619 there was NO United States government; Whites controlled NOTHING. America was under British control. By the time of the ratification of the United States Constitution over half of the states had abolished slavery and the Constitution itself prohibited further importation of slaves into the United States after 1808. The states in what is now the United States were the FIRST in that era of history to abolish slavery. Adding insult to injury, Whites did not invent the institution of slavery. Slaves in the United States were treated better than the slaves of any other country on the globe - and most were practicing slavery during the founding period of our country. Just for the record, the first instance of a runaway slave in the U.S. it was a White man with a BLACK master. Continuing on, Black slaves in the U.S. were treated better, had better living quarters, ate better, were better dressed, had better medical care, had longer life spans, and made more money than their White indentured servant contemporaries (and most of those indentured servants didn't live long enough to secure their freedom.) As if that weren't enough, probably 6 to 8 percent of the Americans owned all the slaves. Blacks cannot legitimately punish those who had nothing to do with slavery - and most lived in far worse conditions than the Black people did. And another point: Blacks want credit for all the advancements in humanity during history. That would mean that they held my ancestors in slavery for over 400 years! My race has risen above slavery and adversity that today's Black people could never begin to fathom.

Liberals have tried to instill a false guilt complex into the psyche of Whites. They have tried to convince them that Whites have no Right to seek a homeland and further their own interests. We have reserved this for the rest of the world, but have conned the White race into thinking there is something evil in having your own country. They coined an emotion laden buzz word called "racism" to get the Whites to give up America in fee simple to the Black race based upon a predominantly false narrative of history. I just called them out on it. Don't expect a response.

It would be almost amazing to learn that the global elite have taken over without firing a shot. It is not amazing nonetheless. A dumbed down society now equates racism with superiority and presumes that is evil. Teens and adults alike will spend a hundred dollar bill or more for an NFL jersey because they think their team is the best. The NAACP wants to advance black people. We are told that the white race in America should be ashamed for things that they did not start but were the first to stop. Will we see the CRT crowd come here and dispute the facts? Continue on R. This is getting good.

Moving right along we come to Intersectionality. In all due honesty, those who espouse Critical Race Theory cannot give us a concise definition of what it is. I'll just quote from one article that is pretty representative of their description of it:

"Intersectionality is a concept that enables us to recognize the fact that perceived group membership can make people vulnerable to various forms of bias, yet because we are simultaneously members of many groups, our complex identities can shape the specific way we each experience that bias.
For example, men and women can often experience racism differently, just as women of different races can experience sexism differently, and so on.
As a result, an intersectional approach goes beyond conventional analysis in order to focus our attention on injuries that we otherwise might not recognize . . . to 1) analyze social problems more fully; 2) shape more effective interventions; and 3) promote more inclusive coalitional advocacy. (p. 3)"

journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/1077800414557827

RESPONSE: These crackpot social engineers have spent billions of billions of dollars to argue that race is a social construct on one hand and, on the other, denying White people the Right to define themselves. It's as if they think God gave them the authority to tell Whites that they do not exist. PART of their strategy, however, is to enlist all kinds of groups to their cause. For example, if a person is Black AND lesbian, they would get to deny that there is a White race AND they would get to claim they are being victimized due to their race AND sexual orientation.

Because they can portray the Whites as an enemy of the lesbians AND the Black people, they get to build force multipliers based upon pure fantasy.

Having read all the previous posts it occurs to me that the people behind CRT deliberately avoid making a consistent statement about what they are after. If you read the links and the places those links take you it becomes apparent. The people behind CRT never define their terminology. That allows their objectives to be fluid. If they do not like what you say then they label it racist. The final thought on all of this is that those behind CRT do not want a discussion that most would consider transparent.

Those pushing CRT do not believe in a right of association and a right of disassociation. They want to commit acts of retaliation for what they perceive as historical wrongs. They do not want us to put those alleged wrongs into the perspective of world history and examine them with any scrutiny. In the end they show that they are the racists. The Resister has been planning to do a podcast and there is some hard hitting material he has been asked not to divulge on the board until he does a podcast on this subject. It is things that none of us considered before. It deserves the biggest audience possible so let us wish him well in finding help to get the podcast idea made into reality.

Based on what the democrats and left are saying in Congress this is a list of what will make you a racist white supremacist white nationalist

1) Do you celebrate the 4th of July?

2) Do you believe in the Constitution as it was originally written and intended?

3) Do you support the belief in American exceptionalism?

4) Do you think the interests of the United States come before the interests of foreign countries?

5) Are you proud of your family's history?

6) Do you own an American flag?

7) Do you believe in the rights of association and disassociation?

8) Do you ever feel anger, disappointment or frustration when liberals tear down a symbol of our country's history?

9) Do you feel that a person earns a seat in college or a give job based on their personal merit over their race?

10) Have you ever felt that discrimination is a natural and inherent inclination?

For every question you answer yes to that is you being 10 percent racist white supremacist white nationalist. Even 10 percent will net you negative reactions from the CRT activists. They are using the diversity bandwagon to kill off the white race.