|
|
Post by The Resister on Jun 25, 2022 2:49:03 GMT
Unless you've been living under a rock or you've been on Mars the last few hours, you know that the United States Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade. The Right to Life has been affirmed. Good news, right?
Like the pro-gun ruling most on the right are rejoicing. To them, it is a blessing. I'm puzzled. These decisions are handed down at a time when we are in the middle of the mid term elections. The left is fired up and they will turn out massive numbers like never before. If we win these fights and then turn over the reins of power to the Democrats, what have we gained? Why did the United States Supreme Court not wait until after the elections to hand down their rulings?
This could have devastating effects on the outcome of elections, particularly in states that are too close to call.
If pro-lifers want one of those easy slogans to deal with abortion, I have a few:
You made your choice when you had sex
Sex entails being held accountable and responsible
Your Rights don't include taking Rights from unborn babies
The best way to stop abortion is to pass a simple law: Your body, Your baby, Your problem. A man should be more than a sperm donor and financial revenue generating resource for a woman and "her" baby. If men were to be held to have an equal say in the child's education, religious upbringing, and general parenting, women might think twice about giving up to just any guy.
That's my rant, but my main point deals with the strategy of the United States Supreme Court. Do they want liberals to send them a buttload of legislation they can find to be unconstitutional? Do they not have anything to do with their time? Why do you think the United States Supreme Court did this at the time they did?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 25, 2022 3:34:47 GMT
Unless you've been living under a rock or you've been on Mars the last few hours, you know that the United States Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade. The Right to Life has been affirmed. Good news, right? Like the pro-gun ruling most on the right are rejoicing. To them, it is a blessing. I'm puzzled. These decisions are handed down at a time when we are in the middle of the mid term elections. The left is fired up and they will turn out massive numbers like never before. If we win these fights and then turn over the reins of power to the Democrats, what have we gained? Why did the United States Supreme Court not wait until after the elections to hand down their rulings? This could have devastating effects on the outcome of elections, particularly in states that are too close to call. If pro-lifers want one of those easy slogans to deal with abortion, I have a few: You made your choice when you had sex Sex entails being held accountable and responsible Your Rights don't include taking Rights from unborn babies The best way to stop abortion is to pass a simple law: Your body, Your baby, Your problem. A man should be more than a sperm donor and financial revenue generating resource for a woman and " her" baby. If men were to be held to have an equal say in the child's education, religious upbringing, and general parenting, women might think twice about giving up to just any guy. That's my rant, but my main point deals with the strategy of the United States Supreme Court. Do they want liberals to send them a buttload of legislation they can find to be unconstitutional? Do they not have anything to do with their time? Why do you think the United States Supreme Court did this at the time they did? There is no reason why I have to be a woman to be for or against abortion. There are lots of things that I support and donate to that I am not even a part of. Such as trade school progrtams for deliquents and dropouts. In fact, 4 years ago I started one of these type of programs for my own community and it is still running well (without me). I recently talked to a Black female hater from Chuicago about this who was ranting about it being the fault of Whites and Christians. She didn't understand when I explained to her that they didn't make abortion illegal but just gave the decision back to the states as it was before. And it has nothng to do with race or religion and it is totally wrong for people to be vandalizing churches becuase of the issue. She claimed that she as a woman, has the RIGHT to abortion and that government shouldsubsidize it since they are bailing out banks and other industries blah blah. I told her that unlike the other rights - speech, assemply, arms, abortion is not one and no where will you find it in any of the Charters of Freedom. I then said that if we were to pretendthat it was a right then other rights should be subsidized too. Government should give me money to start a newspaper, buy me a gun and pay for my time off work to go demonstrate. She replied by calling me a racist... What is your opinion abut abortion when it fcomes to thing such as rape and incest? By the way, I was asked to talk to her because the local small business association asked me to since she was walking her dog around unleashed and not picking up after it. She was even walking into crocery shops and restaurants. The dog is great and tame but not eveyone wants it jumping on them or lathering up their children's faces. Her reply was: **** dat! Yooz Asians juss too tight assed." I relayed her sentiments to the association andthey apologized profusely for having to put me through that and decided to speak to her landlord and have her lease broke. Two week ago the cops came in the evening and arrested her. She has taken a hammer and basically demolished her apartment ut of anger. Surprisingly, the Us embassy stepped in and reinmursed the owner for all the damages (they don't like American making America look bad either). She will be serving jail time and the embassy has no problem with that. |
|
|
|
Post by The Resister on Jun 26, 2022 4:58:39 GMT
Unless you've been living under a rock or you've been on Mars the last few hours, you know that the United States Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade. The Right to Life has been affirmed. Good news, right? Like the pro-gun ruling most on the right are rejoicing. To them, it is a blessing. I'm puzzled. These decisions are handed down at a time when we are in the middle of the mid term elections. The left is fired up and they will turn out massive numbers like never before. If we win these fights and then turn over the reins of power to the Democrats, what have we gained? Why did the United States Supreme Court not wait until after the elections to hand down their rulings? This could have devastating effects on the outcome of elections, particularly in states that are too close to call. If pro-lifers want one of those easy slogans to deal with abortion, I have a few: You made your choice when you had sex Sex entails being held accountable and responsible Your Rights don't include taking Rights from unborn babies The best way to stop abortion is to pass a simple law: Your body, Your baby, Your problem. A man should be more than a sperm donor and financial revenue generating resource for a woman and " her" baby. If men were to be held to have an equal say in the child's education, religious upbringing, and general parenting, women might think twice about giving up to just any guy. That's my rant, but my main point deals with the strategy of the United States Supreme Court. Do they want liberals to send them a buttload of legislation they can find to be unconstitutional? Do they not have anything to do with their time? Why do you think the United States Supreme Court did this at the time they did? There is no reason why I have to be a woman to be for or against abortion. There are lots of things that I support and donate to that I am not even a part of. Such as trade school progrtams for deliquents and dropouts. In fact, 4 years ago I started one of these type of programs for my own community and it is still running well (without me). I recently talked to a Black female hater from Chuicago about this who was ranting about it being the fault of Whites and Christians. She didn't understand when I explained to her that they didn't make abortion illegal but just gave the decision back to the states as it was before. And it has nothng to do with race or religion and it is totally wrong for people to be vandalizing churches becuase of the issue. She claimed that she as a woman, has the RIGHT to abortion and that government shouldsubsidize it since they are bailing out banks and other industries blah blah. I told her that unlike the other rights - speech, assemply, arms, abortion is not one and no where will you find it in any of the Charters of Freedom. I then said that if we were to pretendthat it was a right then other rights should be subsidized too. Government should give me money to start a newspaper, buy me a gun and pay for my time off work to go demonstrate. She replied by calling me a racist... What is your opinion abut abortion when it fcomes to thing such as rape and incest? By the way, I was asked to talk to her because the local small business association asked me to since she was walking her dog around unleashed and not picking up after it. She was even walking into crocery shops and restaurants. The dog is great and tame but not eveyone wants it jumping on them or lathering up their children's faces. Her reply was: **** dat! Yooz Asians juss too tight assed." I relayed her sentiments to the association andthey apologized profusely for having to put me through that and decided to speak to her landlord and have her lease broke. Two week ago the cops came in the evening and arrested her. She has taken a hammer and basically demolished her apartment ut of anger. Surprisingly, the Us embassy stepped in and reinmursed the owner for all the damages (they don't like American making America look bad either). She will be serving jail time and the embassy has no problem with that. Oddly I had this discussion with some extended family members just hours ago. Being churchgoers, they were thrilled by Roe v. Wade. One of my cousins said that it is scientific fact that a baby can live outside the womb at 20 weeks. It's not really my forte' but, let's say he's right. Then the scientific way to address it is the baby becomes a living life at a certain point (and that point is NEVER the moment a woman is filled with sperm.) In the cases of rape and incest, if a woman reports the crime within 48 hours (and maybe an extended period for minors) there is the morning after pill which will make sure that the pregnancy is terminated. There is one other instance, that is where the woman's life or health are in imminent danger and a choice must be made (for example when a doctor says I can save the mother or the baby, but not both.) Other than that, I fall back to my default. When a woman chooses to have sex, she made her choice. Now, she has to hold herself accountable. Does she really think she should be able to breed like an animal and then walk away from all the consequences? What kind of B.S. is that? That same woman wouldn't let the man walk away from the consequences of his actions. Nooooooo... he's on the hook for child support until the child is 18. The least the woman can do is carry the baby for the full term. She can always adopt it out or give it to the father. To let women skate on responsibility and accountability - then tell us about " equality?" Does that sound logical? |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 27, 2022 0:25:38 GMT
There is no reason why I have to be a woman to be for or against abortion. There are lots of things that I support and donate to that I am not even a part of. Such as trade school progrtams for deliquents and dropouts. In fact, 4 years ago I started one of these type of programs for my own community and it is still running well (without me). I recently talked to a Black female hater from Chuicago about this who was ranting about it being the fault of Whites and Christians. She didn't understand when I explained to her that they didn't make abortion illegal but just gave the decision back to the states as it was before. And it has nothng to do with race or religion and it is totally wrong for people to be vandalizing churches becuase of the issue. She claimed that she as a woman, has the RIGHT to abortion and that government shouldsubsidize it since they are bailing out banks and other industries blah blah. I told her that unlike the other rights - speech, assemply, arms, abortion is not one and no where will you find it in any of the Charters of Freedom. I then said that if we were to pretendthat it was a right then other rights should be subsidized too. Government should give me money to start a newspaper, buy me a gun and pay for my time off work to go demonstrate. She replied by calling me a racist... What is your opinion abut abortion when it fcomes to thing such as rape and incest? By the way, I was asked to talk to her because the local small business association asked me to since she was walking her dog around unleashed and not picking up after it. She was even walking into crocery shops and restaurants. The dog is great and tame but not eveyone wants it jumping on them or lathering up their children's faces. Her reply was: **** dat! Yooz Asians juss too tight assed." I relayed her sentiments to the association andthey apologized profusely for having to put me through that and decided to speak to her landlord and have her lease broke. Two week ago the cops came in the evening and arrested her. She has taken a hammer and basically demolished her apartment ut of anger. Surprisingly, the Us embassy stepped in and reinmursed the owner for all the damages (they don't like American making America look bad either). She will be serving jail time and the embassy has no problem with that. Oddly I had this discussion with some extended family members just hours ago. Being churchgoers, they were thrilled by Roe v. Wade. One of my cousins said that it is scientific fact that a baby can live outside the womb at 20 weeks. It's not really my forte' but, let's say he's right. Then the scientific way to address it is the baby becomes a living life at a certain point (and that point is NEVER the moment a woman is filled with sperm.) In the cases of rape and incest, if a woman reports the crime within 48 hours (and maybe an extended period for minors) there is the morning after pill which will make sure that the pregnancy is terminated. There is one other instance, that is where the woman's life or health are in imminent danger and a choice must be made (for example when a doctor says I can save the mother or the baby, but not both.) Other than that, I fall back to my default. When a woman chooses to have sex, she made her choice. Now, she has to hold herself accountable. Does she really think she should be able to breed like an animal and then walk away from all the consequences? What kind of B.S. is that? That same woman wouldn't let the man walk away from the consequences of his actions. Nooooooo... he's on the hook for child support until the child is 18. The least the woman can do is carry the baby for the full term. She can always adopt it out or give it to the father. To let women skate on responsibility and accountability - then tell us about " equality?" Does that sound logical? There was a sharp decline in negro crime rate during the early 90s. Most economics owe this to Roe v. Wade. Most of the would-be born criminals were aborted and never came of age. The black loud-moth political influencer- Candace Owns claims that the black population would be 10x bigger today if it weren't for Roe vs. wade and that Roe was. wade was an anti-black law. Now if her numbers are true then that would mean we would have 10x the amount of Black crime, incarceration, and welfare rates. (not to mention that there would be fewer White and Oriental people due to black homicide and more White and Oriental people paying higher tax rates to support black welfarites and prisons. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 27, 2022 6:18:38 GMT
Here is some good self strategy: Women across America threaten to go on SEX STRIKE in protest over SCOTUS overturning Roe v WadeWomen are threatening not to have sex with men in protest of the Supreme Court's decision to overturn Roe v. Wade. Pro-choice supporters continued to rally through the weekend, now with calls on women to withhold sex from men 'until abortion rights are federal law' as calls for a nationwide sex strike also gain momentum on social media. Protests erupted on Friday following the court's ruling to overturn women's federal right to abortions, with 26 states expected to further restrict or outright ban abortions. 'Women of America: Take the pledge. Because SCOTUS overturned Roe v. Wade, we cannot take the risk of an unintended pregnancy, therefore, we will not have sex with any man — including our husbands — unless we are trying to become pregnant www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10954353/Women-threaten-SEX-STRIKE-protest-SCOTUS-overturning-Roe-v-Wade.htmlThe irony, of course, is they won’t need abortions if they hold a sex strike. We don't even want their genes in the pool. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 2, 2022 5:47:39 GMT
White nationalist: ‘Jews stood in the way’ of ending Roe v. WadeNick Fuentes, who founded the America First Political Action Committee and the ”groyper army,” made the comments on his website’s livestream on Friday. JUNE 30, 2022 10:13  Supporters of the America First ideology and U.S. President Donald Trump cheer on Nick Fuentes, a leader of the America First movement and a white nationalist, as he makes his way through the crowd for a speech during the "Stop the Steal" and "Million MAGA March" protests, November 14, 2020. In the aftermath of the Supreme Court’s overturning of Roe v. Wade, Nick Fuentes, a white nationalist leader and influential figure among the rightmost flank of the Republican Party, told his followers that “Jews stood in the way” of Catholic Supreme Court Justices who “were put on the court to overturn” the 1973 decision that guaranteed the right to an abortion in the United States. Fuentes, who founded the America First Political Action Committee and the ”groyper army,” a radical fringe group, made the comments on his website’s livestream on Friday, according to Right Wing Watch. He added “we need a government of Christians” and “Jewish people can be here, but they can’t make our laws.”"Hysterical Hebrew" extremism trackers like the Anti-Defamation League and Southern Poverty Law Center have maliciously classified Fuentes as a hate group leader... www.jpost.com/diaspora/antisemitism/article-710771
|
|
