|
Post by liquidreigns on Jul 2, 2024 19:42:38 GMT
The nature of the U.S. political system, with its checks and balances, separation of powers, and vibrant civil society, ensures that presidential actions are subject to scrutiny and contestation. This dynamic is a fundamental aspect of American democracy, promoting accountability and preventing the concentration of power.
Lets go through your inept claims.
Claim: "Neither Trump nor Biden are loyal to the Constitution."
Already addressed above. But wait, there's more. This statement is a sweeping generalization that lacks specifics. Loyalty to the Constitution can be demonstrated in various ways, including adherence to its principles, respect for the rule of law, and support for constitutional amendments and interpretations. Both Trump and Biden have taken actions and made statements that they claim support constitutional principles, though these actions are subject to interpretation and debate. A more nuanced approach would consider specific instances where each candidate's actions either aligned with or diverged from constitutional principles.
|
|
professorx
Global Moderator
Site Administrator
Posts: 504
|
Post by professorx on Jul 2, 2024 21:58:18 GMT
The nature of the U.S. political system, with its checks and balances, separation of powers, and vibrant civil society, ensures that presidential actions are subject to scrutiny and contestation. This dynamic is a fundamental aspect of American democracy, promoting accountability and preventing the concentration of power. Lets go through your inept claims. Claim: "Neither Trump nor Biden are loyal to the Constitution." Already addressed above. But wait, there's more. This statement is a sweeping generalization that lacks specifics. Loyalty to the Constitution can be demonstrated in various ways, including adherence to its principles, respect for the rule of law, and support for constitutional amendments and interpretations. Both Trump and Biden have taken actions and made statements that they claim support constitutional principles, though these actions are subject to interpretation and debate. A more nuanced approach would consider specific instances where each candidate's actions either aligned with or diverged from constitutional principles. OMG. More dumb-assery to have to read. Shall we begin? Does this nitwit know what inept means? What makes the fact of stating Trump and Biden are not loyal to the Constitution inept? What kind of qualifications does this dumb cluck think anybody needs to tell the truth? Let me play along. Our resident commie says that the statement is a sweeping generalization that lacks specifics. That is a lie. Click this link. resisters.freeforums.net/thread/179/plain-truth-donald-trumpIf the simpleton would learn how to read the specifics are laid out. You just do not need to do them over and over. Ask once and answer once. To respond to the rest of this uneducated swill the lawful government in the United States is not a democracy. We are supposed to be a republic. The big difference is that the democratic majority cannot vote out God given rights. We do not have a system of checks and balances. They taught that shit in high school and then the SCOTUS declared that they are the final say on what the law is. The intention was that the people be the final arbiters of what the law is. The concentration of power at the moment is with regulatory agencies, quasi government - private corporations (like the private corporation called the IRS), followed by the SCOTUS and then the president. Congress has very little to do with anything since most law is decided by orgs like the IRS, BATFE, Federal Reserve, SEC. and on and on. Executive orders account for the next big share of the pie with the people thru elected representatives having virtually no say.
|
|
|
Post by liquidreigns on Jul 3, 2024 15:46:56 GMT
Claim: "Trump realizes that so he's more than happy to be the dictator that the sheeple demand."
This is an ad hominem and appeal to motive argument. This statement attacks Trump’s character by labeling him a "dictator" and his supporters as "sheeple," which is implying a blind and irrational following. The Resister fails to quote the actual policies or actions of Trump he thinks makes Trump a Dictator.
|
|
professorx
Global Moderator
Site Administrator
Posts: 504
|
Post by professorx on Jul 3, 2024 16:19:38 GMT
Claim: "Trump realizes that so he's more than happy to be the dictator that the sheeple demand." This is an ad hominem and appeal to motive argument. This statement attacks Trump’s character by labeling him a "dictator" and his supporters as "sheeple," which is implying a blind and irrational following. The Resister fails to quote the actual policies or actions of Trump he thinks makes Trump a Dictator. Do you even know what an ad hominem is? Methinks not. The Resister did not attack the man's character in that statement. Politifact responded once to the dictator issue without ruling whether it is true or false. www.politifact.com/article/2023/dec/07/donald-trump-was-asked-if-he-will-be-a-dictator-if/If Trump is committed to being a dictator for a day if reelected then he will find out Rome was not built in a day. Trump's actions on gun control and his immigration policies that he failed to get passed into law with republicans dominating the House and Senate are a telling sign of things to come. That did not attack his character. It is an honest reflection of what he did. Liquidreigns knows full well that many Trump supporters claim not to like the man and then fall back on what a turd Biden is. With that in mind they refuse to call Trump out on gun control, immigration, his role in the clot shot, and his cozy relationship with communist dictators. A man is known by the company he keeps. If the Trump supporters are that afraid to call the man out then they are voting out of desperation. Most people would want to know what a leader is going to do for them. Let me make this simple for you. When you called out the Resister and when you failed to identify yourself after doxing him - when you lied to imaginethat and accused me of being the Resister - when you questioned the fact that the Resister has an honorable discharge from the military - when you posted lies and innuendo always using doxing as a tool to manipulate the discussion you lost the privilege of directly addressing the Resister. He is no longer reading your drivel and plagiarism. The rest of us are taking up that fight so he no longer wastes time on you. These posts you are putting up are having a nasty way of finding their way on your own thread and not anywhere else on this board. That way the odds of the Resister seeing them are nil. You could not take me over there on imaginethat's board. You could not take me on the nuked Liberty Lobby board. You will not succeed here either.
|
|
|
Post by liquidreigns on Jul 3, 2024 17:27:43 GMT
Claim: "The people aren't voting for Trump out of agreement with his policies; they are voting for him out of desperation."
This is a false dichotomy argument suggesting that voters can either support Trump’s policies or vote out of desperation, with no other motivations possible. In reality, voters may support a candidate for a variety of reasons, including agreement with some policies, party loyalty, dissatisfaction with the alternative, or a belief in the candidate's leadership qualities. Recognizing this complexity provides a more accurate understanding of voter behavior.
|
|
professorx
Global Moderator
Site Administrator
Posts: 504
|
Post by professorx on Jul 3, 2024 19:16:52 GMT
Claim: "The people aren't voting for Trump out of agreement with his policies; they are voting for him out of desperation." This is a false dichotomy argument suggesting that voters can either support Trump’s policies or vote out of desperation, with no other motivations possible. In reality, voters may support a candidate for a variety of reasons, including agreement with some policies, party loyalty, dissatisfaction with the alternative, or a belief in the candidate's leadership qualities. Recognizing this complexity provides a more accurate understanding of voter behavior. Again when you steal other peoples criticisms do you bother to look up the big words you obviously do not understand? A false dichotomy - that means a chasm. Not only on this board but in other venues the Resisters organization has queried people on their reasons to support Trump. The number one excuse is Trump is not Biden. This board has made note of it. This is an open forum where the supporters can come and tell us where observers got it wrong. The usual response is that the person does not like Trump but they fear Biden. That is not to say that is the only reason people vote for him and you are dishonest for trying to read into the statement a proposition that the Resister simply did not make. Gun owners spent millions upon millions of dollars challenging the antigun positions that Trump took while president. They are not voting for him out of loyalty. Otherwise they would have accepted his policies instead of fighting them in the courts then supporting him in this election. Trump got the clot shot into the doctors offices and pharmacies so that most Americans could receive it. They did. They complained but they took the shot just as you did. Party loyalty? MAGA is not a party. The hard core anti-abortion people are still supporting Trump despite the fact that Trump walked back his support of allowing abortions in certain circumstances. Trump failed to get his signature legislation on immigration passed into law despite both houses of congress being controlled by republicans. That speaks volumes about the art of the deal poseur and leadership. Keep attacking. We will be glad to keep giving you a beatdown.
|
|
|
Post by johndrake on Jul 4, 2024 17:10:34 GMT
Claim: "Trump realizes that so he's more than happy to be the dictator that the sheeple demand." This is an ad hominem and appeal to motive argument. This statement attacks Trump’s character by labeling him a "dictator" and his supporters as "sheeple," which is implying a blind and irrational following. The Resister fails to quote the actual policies or actions of Trump he thinks makes Trump a Dictator. Our resident mattoid has once again lied and made a personal attack against a person she is obviously afraid of. That she has a cheering section speaks highly of her skill as a supporter of communism. It is amazing that when a person visits a few political sites, Liquid Reigns keeps popping up and responding to anything that constitutionalists post with one person being sought after being the ultimate goal. The cherry on top of the cake is the fact that MAGA supporters blindly follow the lead of our resident mattoid. That shows how blindly Trump supporters will adopt socialist principles without any question or any debate. As has been noted on this thread Trump joked about only being a dictator for a day. It would never end and if posters click on the link the Professor posted they will see how Trump promised the liberals he would change the minds of the NRA and support gun control. He is that convinced of his omnipotence. So are his supporters. Neither they or Liquid come here and answer to the times that Donald J. Trump in his role as president sold them out. They are comfortable with his misuse of the ATF on the bump stock issue. They are comfortable with the fact that he only ruled by executive orders as he could not do the deal with Congress and get legislation passed. This thread really is not about Trump. It is Liquid trying to debate someone she lost the privilege of debating. The personal attacks will not go unchallenged as we know what this is about. Liquid may get carte blanche to attack people on other boards and get the accolades of misinformed low information posters but it will not happen here.
|
|
|
Post by liquidreigns on Jul 12, 2024 8:52:13 GMT
AAaahhhhh, are you whining like a little bitch? You can't handle when someone points out your fallacies and ignorant interpretations. Are you mad because someone actually knows more than you. Bring you and both your little butt buddies here and have a grown up discussion.
You are, after all, the dumb **** that claims he is adept at legal research, having gone to a class to become a Notary. For you claiming to be a Christian Patriot you sure don't understand nor comprehend the founding documents of this great Nation. SMFH
|
|
|
Post by johndrake on Jul 12, 2024 9:11:46 GMT
You are, after all, the dumb **** that claims he is adept at legal research, having gone to a class to become a Notary. For you claiming to be a Christian Patriot you sure don't understand nor comprehend the founding documents of this great Nation. SMFH One can say that Liquid is consistent in her insults. She aims this kind of insult at a poster here and goes on other social media to make fantastical claims not found here nor on the sites our resident communist is trolling. This is a sincere apology. It was a mistake advising Resister to take the mattoid off ignore and respond to her attacks. The best we can do is keep responding to the claims. For Liquid - You continue to bellow with allegations like "claims he is adept at legal research, having gone to a class to become a Notary." Since you like to pretend to be ultra accurate this is a deal offered to you. As the Admin of this board if you can show me even in a pm where such a claim anywhere I will turn this board over to you to do with to do as you wish regardless of what the Resisters organization thinks. If they do not like me making that offer they are free to name another Admin. Taking a class to become a Notary is unnecessary and does not qualify one to do legal research. If you are lying about one thing you are probably lying about much more. If you are proven to be a liar you will be called out. Liquid you do not understand the law, the founding documents, history, basic principles of human decency, nor even basic civics. Most of what you try to post is plagiarized left wing and humanist talking points lacking in any understanding of the topics.
|
|
professorx
Global Moderator
Site Administrator
Posts: 504
|
Post by professorx on Jul 12, 2024 11:47:30 GMT
Having spent some time on this it became clear that some time may be needed to properly answer Liquid Reigns. Let us go back in what we know from history. Liquid first challenged the Resister over an immigration issue on a discussion board. The Resister being a trusting kind told Liquid Reigns about his qualifications and shared a personal issue showing that Liquid Reigns was wrong. It was enough for Liquid Reigns to get personal information and begin doxing the Resister and then stalking him. Every board that Resister goes to Liquid Reigns is right behind.
When you have that kind of obsession with anyone it is not healthy. Reigns has even gone to every board that I post on and accuses me of being the Resister. Even when imaginethat from DTT was faced with the opportunity to do face time with me he still banned me on that board. That pissed me off and now Liquid Reigns has more than one person that wants to see her brought to accountability. With that we are looking at either a bi-sexual male or female and JD thinks it is female. They are an alcoholic of about 52 to 57 years of age give or take a couple of years in either direction. She has no friends and little for a life. She thinks highly of the Resister which explains that where he goes she follows.
This is an obsession that has gone on for over a decade and a half by all accounts. That means that this individual could become violent and may have done acts of violence to children and maybe small animals in the past. She no longer needs to be ignored but to be confronted. As per JD's assessment she probably does plagiarizes a lot of her posts from the Internet. No matter what position the Resister takes she takes the opposite. If one studies her posts she even argues her own positions. It is as if she needs validation from the one person she knows is much smarter than she is. For those that are not aware the Resister is offering $3500 in cash to the person that will identify Liquid Reigns and tell him where to locate her. You cannot blame him. When you become the major focus of someone elses life it can be annoying. In this case I think Liquid Reigns poses a real physical threat. She does not understand that if she had wanted a debate doxing someone was not the way to get their attention. Liquid Reigns reminds me a lot of Trump. If you disagree with their delusions of grandeur and prove them wrong they will move heaven and earth to discredit you. The consequence to that is that Liquid Reigns lost the privilege of debating the Resister until she puts herself on a level playing field and introduces herself. I think this board has expended a sufficient amount of time on Reigns. You are doing the right thing by moving those posts into a humor category. And if Liquid Reigns has any family at all she should be trying to establish some kind of communication and relationship with them. She has allowed this to consume her and she has not made any progress in that length of time. To show that and maybe be a bit premature the podcast starts in short order in audio format. If it is successful it will expand into video as well.
I do want to say something to Liquid Reigns personally. Thank you for all the negative criticisms. When we advise the Resister on issues some of the stuff you looked up on the Internet will be addressed and that will save time from waiting on someone else to bring the issue up. Most of us here are going to be studying some of your many posts to see what is worth addressing. Your help in that regard was beneficial. It will make the podcasts even better. Stay tuned everyone for details about the podcast.
|
|
|
Post by johndrake on Aug 11, 2024 2:19:22 GMT
The resident comrade never ceases to entertain. She follows The Resister from one board to another. On advice of your administrator here Resister found the ignore button. Not so much for the rest of us here. While following some of the goings on at another board this exchange took place between curious fiend(aka the fiend) and The Resister regarding some posts made by kingsolomon... So ready to pounce on The Resister the comrade made an ass of herself. The following is the exchange
fiend - (to The Resister) this twerplet (meaning kingsolomon...) sounds like you mate
The Resister - How do you know it isn't?
Liquid Reigns - Simple, there is no eye witness accounts, no witnesses, no archeological evidence, no nothing other than stories handed down or taken from civilizations that pre-existed the newest civilization. The Bible is nothing more than a construct that was made centuries after this so called Jesus of Nazareth. Do you know how many times the Bible has been re-constructed and changed since its first printing? Do you know how many verses were changed to fit a narrative?
Your interpretation of Adam and Eve has been shown to be nothing more than it being a racist fringe theory that has been debunked and thrown out by academia, archeological, and historical evidence.
If the Bible or its stories were true, then there would be clear actual evidence of them being more than simple stories. Why are there no eyewitness accounts, no actual writings found that speak of this "Jesus" during the period he supposedly existed? Why is the New Testament taken from Greek translations of Aramaic writings and infused with Greek literature? Why does Hercules sound a lot like this Jesus character (both born to virgin women by a God)? How about Zues and God (both the King of Gods)? How about Homers Odyssey being paralleled in the Bible? End of that part of the discussion
If Liquid were not so sad she would almost be funny. She is factually wrong but until she wants a discussion on a equal playing field nobody here will entertain the trolling. She just gets her own thread here and put in her place.
And sadly no. Academia has not debunked the seedline doctrine or thrown it out. There is no evidence of that anywhere.
|
|
professorx
Global Moderator
Site Administrator
Posts: 504
|
Post by professorx on Aug 19, 2024 12:30:02 GMT
Thanks to J.D. for pointing me in the direction of where the resident commie troll went. Reigns is still here lurking and reading but choosing to try and start wars from afar. The problem is nobody cares and only J.D. was keeping up with the attempts to draw Resister into a waste of time. Due to the events at Dumber Than Turds this became personal with me. When Liquid could not beat me in a debate she chose to accuse me of being Resister. I was banned because it was easier for imaginethat to eliminate the competition rather than to let me post in the same way he and his sockpuppets along with Liquid were posting.
Be that as it may this is the only response that Liquid will ever be due from me. It is good that Liquid has found a place where she can post and have a regular cheering crowd. The act of attacking sources may prove popular since all Liquid likes to do is proclaim something to be true and thinks that makes it so. Attacking peoples sources is ok provided that you can refute the source. A prime example is to attack others without any basis. Reigns attacked E. Raymond Capt when his writings were used. Yet Reigns cannot provide you with even a single sentence that says anything negative about Capt from any of his contemporaries.
Others may have knowledge of subject matter and only use the Internet as a source rather than do as Reigns does expecting readers to accept a position simply because it is posted and gives others bias confirmation. When Liquid attacks people with that whatafukn moron response or the SMH replies it is an indication of weakness and ignorance coupled with disrespect. It is a sign of weakness and of ignorance. It only says she is unable or unwilling to accept positions different from her own. For that reason Liquid Reigns will never be qualified to debate anyone. I'm not who she claimed and imaginethat was too much of a rat to call me and do face time in order to prove Liquid is a liar. I'm glad we are finally done with the troll. This board can now move forward and leave that cancer on the face of humanity to choke on her own phlegm.
|
|
|
Post by johndrake on Aug 19, 2024 17:49:03 GMT
For those that stop by here and check this thread out it has been shown that the board troll is more clownish than Ronald McDonald was. Calling people names and questioning sources without a source to refute your opponent does not make you appear superior. It makes you look like what you claim about your opposition. You were now forced into starting your own threads and you may someday have to start defending them. Luckily you chose a site where the most prolific poster is a gay malcontent that never leaves his house and if you study his posts believes that every person on earth is inferior to him. The two of you should get along just fine.
The Resister answered weaponoffreedom's questions regarding America being founded on Christian principles. If anyone wants to be convinced one way or another they should check out that site and the resource material. Liquid Reigns can attempt to cast aspersions on the posts but what she cannot do is disprove the propositions that were offered. It looks like Liquid Reigns threw down the gauntlet and was soundly defeated here. That should wrap it up. The only think that can be said is that if you want a civil conversation you must act in a civilized manner. Don't call people names and don't assume the information is incorrect until you research it. In the instant case weaponoffreedom and Liquid will both remain on safe ground among the LGBTQ community and atheists where they can try to convince each other that they hold a monopoly on all knowledge and understanding.
|
|