Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 5, 2022 6:08:02 GMT
NOTICE ABOUT REPLIES ON THIS THREADThere were two posts that were wholly off topic for this forum. Those replies have been moved to: resisters.freeforums.net/thread/61/lost-maga-threadI will make the appropriate replies there. Guys, please observe the posting rules. Just a friendly suggestion - You got to loosen up on this. I know you started a new board and want to make it good, I do. Threads naturally find their own path; as long as it is not trolling, it is probably best to let them be. Not everyone is a mind-reader. @nosocialismplease put effort as a non-native English speaker and non-American to voice his opinion in good faith. He is not a guy that would post something he doesn't personally feel is relevant and neither would I. Would it not be better to correct his understanding of history and current state affairs? You have started a lot of categories here and it can be confusing. What will happen if you keep regulating posts that are made in good faith, people will start feeling a lot of tension every time they post on one of your topics and might decide just not to give their opinion and you will in the end find yourself to be the only one posting on your threads. You certainly don't want that. Sincerely. |
|
|
|
Post by The Resister on Jul 5, 2022 13:19:15 GMT
I have moved the post. Your suggestion is duly noted; however, I've put a lot of time into thinking about why some of these boards fail. Maybe for general discussion it doesn't matter. You start with a topic about brainwashing and end up with Trump and the Ku Klux Klan. If you are interested in a specific topic, of what interest are these "life of their own threads?"
On that specific thread, I got a text within 15 minutes of your post telling me where people were going with that topic. I think if people read the rules of the board and we moderate the forums we can get people to discuss ONE thing. This is my compromise for you:
On all forums other than American Strategic Think Tank you and NSP can derail every single topic with your usual discussion unless a poster reports you. In that case I will admonish you to remain within the rules and if you ignore that, I will delete your posts when you break the rules against derailing threads. If you want to talk about race, you can start a thread. If you want to talk about global politics, you can start a thread. But, not every conversation has to pivot back to one or two topics.
Perhaps in time you will come to realize the objective of such a policy, but I'm convinced that when a reader starts reading about one topic, they don't like the "life of its own" method so that no subject is ever covered. I just don't think anyone wants to read about non-related matter, especially in a think tank topic whose objective is to teach and have an in depth conversation. All the complaining, whining, etc. detract from the subject matter. I've offered you a good compromise to this. Hopefully that will be enough.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 7, 2022 8:11:37 GMT
I have moved the post. Your suggestion is duly noted; however, I've put a lot of time into thinking about why some of these boards fail. Maybe for general discussion it doesn't matter. You start with a topic about brainwashing and end up with Trump and the Ku Klux Klan. If you are interested in a specific topic, of what interest are these " life of their own threads?" On that specific thread, I got a text within 15 minutes of your post telling me where people were going with that topic. I think if people read the rules of the board and we moderate the forums we can get people to discuss ONE thing. This is my compromise for you: On all forums other than American Strategic Think Tank you and NSP can derail every single topic with your usual discussion unless a poster reports you. In that case I will admonish you to remain within the rules and if you ignore that, I will delete your posts when you break the rules against derailing threads. If you want to talk about race, you can start a thread. If you want to talk about global politics, you can start a thread. But, not every conversation has to pivot back to one or two topics. Perhaps in time you will come to realize the objective of such a policy, but I'm convinced that when a reader starts reading about one topic, they don't like the " life of its own" method so that no subject is ever covered. I just don't think anyone wants to read about non-related matter, especially in a think tank topic whose objective is to teach and have an in depth conversation. All the complaining, whining, etc. detract from the subject matter. I've offered you a good compromise to this. Hopefully that will be enough. In your opinion, who are the ones instigating the killings and why? Simple question. |
|
|
|
Post by The Resister on Jul 7, 2022 15:59:40 GMT
I have moved the post. Your suggestion is duly noted; however, I've put a lot of time into thinking about why some of these boards fail. Maybe for general discussion it doesn't matter. You start with a topic about brainwashing and end up with Trump and the Ku Klux Klan. If you are interested in a specific topic, of what interest are these " life of their own threads?" On that specific thread, I got a text within 15 minutes of your post telling me where people were going with that topic. I think if people read the rules of the board and we moderate the forums we can get people to discuss ONE thing. This is my compromise for you: On all forums other than American Strategic Think Tank you and NSP can derail every single topic with your usual discussion unless a poster reports you. In that case I will admonish you to remain within the rules and if you ignore that, I will delete your posts when you break the rules against derailing threads. If you want to talk about race, you can start a thread. If you want to talk about global politics, you can start a thread. But, not every conversation has to pivot back to one or two topics. Perhaps in time you will come to realize the objective of such a policy, but I'm convinced that when a reader starts reading about one topic, they don't like the " life of its own" method so that no subject is ever covered. I just don't think anyone wants to read about non-related matter, especially in a think tank topic whose objective is to teach and have an in depth conversation. All the complaining, whining, etc. detract from the subject matter. I've offered you a good compromise to this. Hopefully that will be enough. In your opinion, who are the ones instigating the killings and why? Simple question. Here is your honest and very short and simple answer: I don’t have any fact that leads me to know who to accuseHere is the rest of the story: I know, for a fact, that Pavlovian Conditioning and subliminal messaging are being used to brainwash and radicalize the youth. That tells me that psychologists and / or psychiatrists are being employed to do this stuff. It’s costly and the people who can afford it are few and far between. High on my list of suspects would be the ADL or maybe George Soros. Since many government agencies operate independently and without limitations from the executive, legislative and / or judicial branches, they may very well be people within a certain agency (as differentiated from the agency itself.) I used to have high regard for the Navy SEALs until they endorsed one of their own who became a transsexual and became a woman. He went on to write the book Warrior Princess. I’d put rogue agents from the CIA in front of them, however. Think about it realistically. The feds have time to harass some patriots 24 / 7. You met one. He isn’t an agent; just a paid prick that follows a few people around for his livelihood. They troll and they investigate, but the pretend not to be able to figure out who the next mass shooter is when freaking children can do it. And, on top of that, the LEO community wants you to believe that they don’t see the warning signs and can’t stop mass shooters until after the fact. What happened in Uvalde, Texas should have been a wake up call. The locals were unsure of jurisdiction? They waited and let the Border Patrol go in? A cop father allows his own child to be murdered. What has to happen for people to put the pieces of the puzzle together? |
|
