|
|
Post by The Resister on Jul 7, 2022 19:45:31 GMT
This is a wordy article with some normal mainstream flaws that discusses the differences between our Constitution versus the Confederate Constitution: www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/how-the-confederate-constitution-was-different-from-the-us-constitution/ar-AAZkHOm?li=BBnb7Kz#commentsLike most mainstream lies, they keep denying the fact that God IS mentioned in the Constitution and his divinity is implied as well. IF, as atheists claim, the framers were heathens, atheists, agnostics, etc. they would NEVER have signed a document that was done " In the year of our Lord..." That acknowledges a Christian God all by itself. The author lies about slavery as well. Being that slavery was neither moral or immoral by standards WORLD-WIDE you cannot, in all honesty, say that the underlying reason for the South breaking with the Northern states was to protect slavery. In their arguments liberals are only consistent with inconsistency. Slavery was not mentioned in the Constitution; it was a world wide practice; the CSA was protecting a state's right. When patriots dumped tea into the Boston Harbor, it wasn't so much about the amount of the tax; it was the principle. Maybe one day we will have an honest conversation about slavery and put it into context. Until then, it is enough to understand the history of our laws. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 8, 2022 8:51:13 GMT
This is a wordy article with some normal mainstream flaws that discusses the differences between our Constitution versus the Confederate Constitution: www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/how-the-confederate-constitution-was-different-from-the-us-constitution/ar-AAZkHOm?li=BBnb7Kz#commentsLike most mainstream lies, they keep denying the fact that God IS mentioned in the Constitution and his divinity is implied as well. IF, as atheists claim, the framers were heathens, atheists, agnostics, etc. they would NEVER have signed a document that was done " In the year of our Lord..." That acknowledges a Christian God all by itself. The author lies about slavery as well. Being that slavery was neither moral or immoral by standards WORLD-WIDE you cannot, in all honesty, say that the underlying reason for the South breaking with the Northern states was to protect slavery. In their arguments liberals are only consistent with inconsistency. Slavery was not mentioned in the Constitution; it was a world wide practice; the CSA was protecting a state's right. When patriots dumped tea into the Boston Harbor, it wasn't so much about the amount of the tax; it was the principle. Maybe one day we will have an honest conversation about slavery and put it into context. Until then, it is enough to understand the history of our laws. I have to say that was one of the best articles I've read in a while and so was the video. The liberals and BLM people do not represent all blacks. They don't realize that they are many blacks who are proud of being from the south, some even more than whites. I'm not going to get into the slavery thing but it was a very common thing to have a black as a butler or maid and they were not treated poorly. Instead, most of them were treated like part of the family. So many white children in the south at one time were nannied by blacks who worked in the household and were top proper values and things like table manners. The black economist Thomas Sowell, whose mother was a maid in a white house was taught how to read and write and how to prepare delicious food and how to make proper household decisions which she brought home to her own house. Thomas Sowell speaks about this in one of his books and says that it was because of this that he and the rest of his family were able to move up in life. |
|
professorx
Global Moderator
Site Administrator
Posts: 413 
|
Post by professorx on Jul 9, 2022 12:13:31 GMT
This is a wordy article with some normal mainstream flaws that discusses the differences between our Constitution versus the Confederate Constitution: www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/how-the-confederate-constitution-was-different-from-the-us-constitution/ar-AAZkHOm?li=BBnb7Kz#commentsLike most mainstream lies, they keep denying the fact that God IS mentioned in the Constitution and his divinity is implied as well. IF, as atheists claim, the framers were heathens, atheists, agnostics, etc. they would NEVER have signed a document that was done " In the year of our Lord..." That acknowledges a Christian God all by itself. The author lies about slavery as well. Being that slavery was neither moral or immoral by standards WORLD-WIDE you cannot, in all honesty, say that the underlying reason for the South breaking with the Northern states was to protect slavery. In their arguments liberals are only consistent with inconsistency. Slavery was not mentioned in the Constitution; it was a world wide practice; the CSA was protecting a state's right. When patriots dumped tea into the Boston Harbor, it wasn't so much about the amount of the tax; it was the principle. Maybe one day we will have an honest conversation about slavery and put it into context. Until then, it is enough to understand the history of our laws. I have to say that was one of the best articles I've read in a while and so was the video. The liberals and BLM people do not represent all blacks. They don't realize that they are many blacks who are proud of being from the south, some even more than whites. I'm not going to get into the slavery thing but it was a very common thing to have a black as a butler or maid and they were not treated poorly. Instead, most of them were treated like part of the family. So many white children in the south at one time were nannied by blacks who worked in the household and were top proper values and things like table manners. The black economist Thomas Sowell, whose mother was a maid in a white house was taught how to read and write and how to prepare delicious food and how to make proper household decisions which she brought home to her own house. Thomas Sowell speaks about this in one of his books and says that it was because of this that he and the rest of his family were able to move up in life. The msm doesn't want to talk facts about that time in history. The slaves in America were treated better than the slaves in any country. Most ate better and had better health care than their white counterparts. They were educated by the whites and paid a salary in most cases. One site that banned me started out with this very conversation. I was not disrespectful and wrote in the same tone as in this posting. Society is just at a point that we dare not have an honest conversation for fear of offending those who have been miseducated. I wish the south would have won. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 9, 2022 23:58:32 GMT
I wish the south would have won. They almost did if it was not for a secret letter that was retrieved. One of the reasons why there are so many negros in the south is because freed negros from the north were cold and starving and went south to over their services. Most people talk crap about the Jim Crow laws but forget that Whites also had to abide by them. A White man could be jailed for entering a black community and starting trouble to try or take away Black women. Blacks were doing great under Jim Crow. They had their own communities with crime and divorce rates that were lower than Whites, they had their own universities, were practically all church-going and homosexuality was unheard of. Then loudmouths - King and Malcolm Little came in and destroyed all they had worked for and made them feel they were entitled. No one deserves anything and we should thank God that we don't get what we deserve. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 10, 2022 1:28:57 GMT
I have read the post on this subject and I have great historical knowledge of the Confederacy and the Confederate and U.S. Constitution. When the Confederacy was founded in 1861 the Government had to act quickly being at war early in its founding. A Constitution was drafted and adopted close to the U.S. Constitution and many of the Confederacy desired similar rights to the U.S. Constitution. Slavery was not the issue we know today. General Sherman a real piece of Garbage owned 100 Slaves and whipped them along routes himself under orders to his troops when they followed his Army to close. Sherman just like Grant and Lincoln, nobody cared about Slavery as we are made to believe today.
The British began bringing slaves into America years before and the U.S. had Slaves before the Civil War. Lincoln used Slavery as a means to have the North fight the South. They needed a Boogeyman. Just as Bush needed a Boogeyman blaming Terrorist for 911. Americans quickly desired war believing terrorists destructed America.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 10, 2022 2:13:29 GMT
The British began bringing slaves into America years before and the U.S. had Slaves before the Civil War. Lincoln used Slavery as a means to have the North fight the South. They needed a Boogeyman. Just as Bush needed a Boogeyman blaming Terrorist for 911. Americans quickly desired war believing terrorists destructed America. Hi Lee, Slavery is an English thing. They brought over the slave along with themselves (the original colonists). After the revolution, slavery was never legal in America. The Blacks should be demanding reparations and repatriation from the English. |
|
