|
|
Post by The Resister on Dec 18, 2023 21:01:14 GMT
Can I have ten minutes of your time?Every week I come here to generate discussions and every week hundreds of you read these posts; however few people ever bother to make a reply. This is where America stands and you are entitled to the truth and this will make you think. You are watching the Republic gasping on its last breath of air and I'm not going to sugar coat this or blow smoke up your nether regions. We are engaged in religious wars, culture wars, race wars and economic wars. Dishonesty is THE tool by which Americans have decided to use as a strategy. It ain't working. A poster on social media has taken to calling me " Mr. Race and Religion." The reason being is that I have stated that America was founded on the twin pillars of race and religion. From America's very beginning we were founded on Christian principles. The FIRST governing document of the New World was the Mayflower Compact of 1620 issued when the Pilgrims ended up on Plymouth Rock. It reads (in part): " IN THE NAME OF GOD, AMEN. We, whose names are underwritten, the Loyal Subjects of our dread Sovereign Lord King James, by the Grace of God, of Great Britain, France, and Ireland, King, Defender of the Faith, &c. Having undertaken for the Glory of God, and Advancement of the Christian Faith, and the Honour of our King and Country..." We've done an entire thread here about America being a Christian Nation and what that means: resisters.freeforums.net/thread/165/america-founded-on-christian-principlesInsofar as race goes, within weeks of the ratification of the United States Constitution, Congress enacted our FIRST immigration law which limited citizenship to " free white persons." Only male landowners were allowed to vote. Let me quote National Geographic on this point: " Following the American Revolution, the new country transitioned from a period of being under British rule to developing its own government. After the failure of the Articles of Confederation, the country adopted the United States Constitution in 1787. Article 1 of the Constitution empowers state legislatures to oversee federal elections. Suffrage, or the right to vote, was granted exclusively to white, land-owning men." education.nationalgeographic.org/resource/voting-rights-throughout-history/Nonwhites in early America could not become citizens; they couldn't vote (which meant they couldn't hold public office); it was until 1967 that the bans against inter-racial marriage were abolished by the United States Supreme Court in Loving v. Virginia. What do those who try to be critics expect? Do they want me to lie to you for the privilege of debating them and NOT having my findings made public for your consideration? When I go to their sites, the critics are quick to censor me, delete my posts and then ban me. Then, when invited here, they accuse us of being an " echo chamber." What a load of BS!What the American people do NOT want is the truth. They are the ones that want an echo chamber. THAT is why they censor the honest narrative and eventually ban anyone willing to tell you the facts. None of that has to do with my personal feelings. In all these years of battling those who run from the honest truth there is one thing they have NEVER done: Nobody ever bothered to ask me what my personal view was. I'm limited by the rules as to how many paragraphs I can post, but this is a rant. Get ready. Before 2023 ends I want you to have the whole truth.
|
|
|
|
Post by The Resister on Dec 19, 2023 4:47:29 GMT
Part 2
This site was intended to be more than a social site. People on social media PRETEND that they want a debate, but they hide on sites that censor posts they don't like. That isn't done here. I've played in the other guy's back yard going through the motions to "debate" them only to have them begin calling me names and making idiotic allegations right out of the chute. They talk about me, pretend that they are cross examining me and wanting me to "prove" every detail to THEIR satisfaction. What kind of dumbassery is that? In a debate, if you start calling someone names or making unsubstantiated claims about a person, that is an automatic disqualification. You lose the debate. THAT is why there have been no serious challengers. In a debate it is not the participants that decide what has been substantially proven or disproven. That is the job of the readers to decide. That is a decision I can live with.
Meanwhile, the Ds and Rs; Republicans and Democrats; left and right; Libertarians, MAGA, communists socialists, etc. are posting memes, censoring their competition and saying the same B.S. over and over and over again, we have been offering real solutions to America's problems. We aren't talking about some pie in the sky wall that won't be built until we become a totalitarian POLICE STATE. We aren't promoting the Nanny State wherein over half of the American people are dependent on the government for at least some portion of their daily bread, if not the whole loaf.
The current "solutions" offered in mainstream are failing, have been failing and will fail in the future. The major parties and organizations on both sides are going to the same destination, just by different routes. The one commonality they all have is that they want to increase the size, power and / or scope of government to achieve their goals. My solutions aren't predicated upon such a flawed assumption. I submit to you that the more that has been done to rectify what people perceive as problems has gotten worse and worse regardless of what new law was passed. IF America were great, then the best way to make it great AGAIN is to go back and repeal all the laws that exist from that moment until now with one thought in mind: increasing the size, power, and / or scope of government is detrimental to the best interests of the citizenry and lays the groundwork for tyranny.
The right wants to build a wall around America and enforce the National ID / REAL ID Act, forcing you to use a Socialist Surveillance Number ... I mean "Social Security Number" as your unique identifier. Those who think like that can't get it through their heads that is the way that government tracks everyone from the womb to the tomb, making any pretense of getting off the grid, pulling out, or resisting unconstitutional government a total impossibility. You may as well go along to get along if you're going to be that stupid. IF you pay attention to the laws and discuss the alternatives, you will see there are ways of addressing your concerns without employing solutions that don't work. Fight against the Police State.
The left wants B.S. laws like gun control: Red Flag Gun Laws, waiting periods, gun registration, magazine bans, banning various features on guns, creating second class citizens that are banned from owning a gun, gun bans, etc., etc. ad infinitum. These are the most aggravating B.S. artists on God's green earth. Gun control is not crime control. It doesn't make anyone safe; it opens the door for the POLICE STATE the right wants to build and guarantees that resistance CAN'T happen. The left bans me from their sites because I point out an uncomfortable truth: they reject any legislation that would reduce the misuse of firearms when it does not contain gun control language. Tell them you want to focus on mental health and put dangerous people into protective custody BEFORE they go a killing spree and they reject it. The right is equally deluded, making bogus claims that I'm talking Red Flag Gun Laws. The idiocy is astounding! Nick Cruz, one of the major mass shooters of our time, had at least 49 interactions with the police and / or people in positions that could have gotten him the right help. Somewhere along the way - from fights in school to multiple suspensions for threats / altercations; from reports of torturing / killing small animals and reports of other threatening behaviors someone should have gotten him some help. They didn't need to take his guns out of his house; they needed to bring him in for evaluation and determine if he were sane and how much of a threat he posed. The Constitution requires probable cause to get someone into custody; it requires due process; it would support a taxpayer paid attorney for those who couldn't afford one AND any such proposed legislation could contain language that penalizes and punishes anyone that misuses the law. Nobody wants to hear it so they want to allow the courts to decide and, ultimately, that will mean gun control.
I've spent a lot of time here talking about America being a Christian nation and the Right to have personal property. We've addressed subjects like race, religion, civil liberties, religious Rights, taxes, wars, sexual identity issues, etc. and the only thing people care to hear is what a bunch of political propaganda prostitutes in Washington Wonderland, District of Corruption are beating their gums about. Are things getting better for you? And I don't even know what each of you believes... the answer is the same. You're not satisfied nor will you be. Mainstream is taking you to the same destination regardless of what mainstream name they use. As we approach 2024 I am challenging each and every person out there to get IN the discussion. You don't like it because I'm the primary voice here? Then register, read the rules and get INTO the conversation. If you cannot put your personal opinions out there and defend them, maybe you really don't believe in them.
"Telling a truth is not only a matter of character, but is also a matter of appreciating factual situations and representing them without bias." —M. K. Soni, author and homeopath
Thank you for those minutes and I will be happy to respond to anything you have to say OR just provide you the opportunity to say what you wanted to - without censorship or deletion.
|
|
|
|
Post by noclevername on Dec 19, 2023 13:46:57 GMT
The fact that you did not rely on memes and group think is what has been interesting about this board. It is hard to figure. The people urging you to continue have not found the time to post here or otherwise engage. Posters like lee come by once a month and the poster weaponoffreedom high tailed it out of here the moment that his questions were fairly answered. It might not seem rewarding to you. FYI you are reaching one person on this board and if that makes a difference the effort was not in vain.
|
|
|
|
Post by The Resister on Dec 20, 2023 3:20:27 GMT
The fact that you did not rely on memes and group think is what has been interesting about this board. It is hard to figure. The people urging you to continue have not found the time to post here or otherwise engage. Posters like lee come by once a month and the poster weaponoffreedom high tailed it out of here the moment that his questions were fairly answered. It might not seem rewarding to you. FYI you are reaching one person on this board and if that makes a difference the effort was not in vain. Thank you for checking in. At least one person on this board is paying attention. BTW, I told "lee" in an e mail today why people he's inviting aren't posting here. If he isn't posting, what makes him think his friends will post on a board HE won't post regularly on? But I digress. Many years ago I worked for John Tanton. John Tanton founded / financed a lot of anti-immigrant nonprofits like Federation for American Immigration Reform (FAIR), NumbersUSA and about a dozen nonprofits in all to deal with that issue. So, I have think tank experience on the issue. I spoke out as an activist and appeared on radio, tv and in newspapers - sometimes debating the biggest names in the business. And, wanting to have the answers, I spent SIX YEARS working in immigration law. When I " debate" the right (which always begins as a mere discussion) I lay my credentials on the table so that they know I have the requisite experience in that field to discuss it. Still, instead of having enough common sense to ask questions and see what alternatives we have to resolve the issues revolving around immigration, they choose to start a pissing match with the objective of getting me banned from whatever site we're on. How can the people on the right be so freaking stupid? If you don't know the parameters, then you cannot arrive at a logical conclusion. The fact that they have spent over a quarter of a century pursuing a losing political / legal argument should tell them I just might have something different. Some political propaganda prostitutes have B.S.ed those on the right to the point that they wouldn't know the truth if it bit them on their white arse. The left is much smarter. For example: Some years ago county Sheriffs decided not to enforce the Brady mandate to do background checks on people who purchase weapons. They went all the way to the United States Supreme Court wherein the high Court ruled that state and local governments cannot be compelled to enforce federal laws (Printz v. US.) A couple of years later, jurisdictions with Sanctuary Cities went to court and successfully defended the state and local government's Right to allow Sanctuary Cities because they cannot be compelled to enforce federal laws. They cited Printz. I did legal research on that case and Sheriff Richard Mack, one of the original plaintiffs, said he would never have pursued the case if he knew how it could be used. The right let the issue die. They love to wallow in defeat. Recently courts have began declaring that Second Amendment Sanctuary Cities are not protected by law: www.ncja.org/crimeandjusticenews/court-rules-against-2a-sanctuary-ordinanceSanctuary is sanctuary whether it protects the Second Amendment OR undocumented foreigners. The right is too deaf, dumb, blind and stupid to see that they could use those anti Second Amendment rulings regarding Sanctuary Cities and apply it those places that protect undocumented foreigners. And those people have the gall to attempt to " debate" me while falsely accusing me of being on the left. I'm doing a rant. I'm just getting cranked up. |
|
|
|
Post by The Resister on Dec 22, 2023 4:15:52 GMT
I started a rant and those who gave me the first ten minutes of their day are entitled to this challenge. If I'm not pissing someone off, I'm not doing my job. Let me pick up where I left off:
The talking heads of the NEW WORLD ORDER have blown smoke up the arse of the right and have proven something that Jesus himself said:
"15 Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye compass sea and land to make one proselyte, and when he is made, ye make him twofold more the child of hell than yourselves." Mathew 23: 15
Once the right has been indoctrinated into the fables of the left, they double down and become far worse than the evil people they rail against. These people would erect a wall around the United States; they would put the Mark of the Beast on every American under the pretext of "knowing who is in the United States." They would have you give up essential Liberty in exchange for a false promise of temporary Safety.
The left demands background checks and the right gives them the teeth to have that mean something with National ID. It's one hand washing the other with neither side able to answer a few basic questions. For example:
How did the United States become the greatest nation in the annals of history with so - called "open borders?"
What laws did we pass that made coming here that attractive to the third world?
The best that this country can do is to elect pathological liars that are on the verge of senility like Trump and Biden. They tell the people what they want to hear and then do the polar opposite. And we walk right into the trap, unable and unwilling to discuss the issue from every possible perspective.
|
|
|
|
Post by The Resister on Dec 22, 2023 16:31:58 GMT
I had to sleep on it a while before doing a bit more on this.
For YEARS (about 25 give or take) I have been IN the immigration discussion (and I will talk about other issues in this rant.) Here is what I wanted to say to those on the right:
The people on the right say they don't care if people come here, provided they do it "legally." So, let me get this straight. We only allow 65,000 people to come here and work "legally" and an additional 20,000 that have a master's degree to come in as guest workers. Contrast that to the nearly TEN TIMES that amount that we naturalize as citizens! There seems to be something that I'm missing. Those naturalized citizens become Democrats (by and large as I've demonstrated with facts in the past.) Democrats then vote the right into oblivion. So, what is the right saying here? They don't care if we get over-run provided that the third world does it "legally?" What IS their argument?
The right claims that the undocumented don't pay taxes. That's a lie. The ONLY tax that the right can dispute is the income tax and they are lying about that. Most undocumented get an Individual Tax Identification Number and pay the damn tax. But, let's give them the argument just for chits and giggles. Why do we demand that others be subjected to the tyranny and slavery that the Americans voted for themselves? Seriously. The income tax is a graduated tax - a plank out of the Communist Manifesto. It is is illegal, immoral, unconscionable, indefensible and most of all unconstitutional as enforced. And, with the Fair Tax on the table, it's not like the American people don't have the opportunity to extricate themselves from under that albatross. We could get rid of the income tax and the IRS in the next session of the legislature. We could do that AND resolve the immigrant crisis in ONE session of the legislature. All it requires is a different perspective and the will to force Congress to act. Yet we'd rather screw ourselves out of our Rights and Liberties to prove some idiotic political argument that has been consistently defeated for a quarter of a century plus at this point. I think I have earned the Right to demand an answer to that.
What is the point of giving your country away "legally?" What kind of B.S. is that? The welcome mat coming into the United States is the Statue of Liberty. Do you know the words at the base of that welcome mat?
"Give me your tired, your poor, Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free, The wretched refuse of your teeming shore. Send these, the homeless, tempest-tost to me, I lift my lamp beside the golden door!"
Isn't that exactly WHO is coming into the United States? Aren't we the home to the homeless and the wretched refuse of the world? And, to add insult to injury, the right demands that we run background checks on those entering so that we know who is coming in. What an absolute load of horse dung! Do you honestly believe that the governments of China, Iraq, Iran, Russia, etc., etc. are going to level with us and send people that want to better their own lives and possibly become American citizens? Is anybody reading this really that naïve? Anybody?
I'm kind of changing the parameters on you. I'm making you think. And my rant is still in its infant stages. I'm eventually going to tell you what I think whether you interact or not.
|
|
